Answer:
The price of the bond is 1,072.19
Explanation:
The price at which the bond trades for can be computed using the pv formula in excel which tries to discount to present value all the cash inflows receivable from the bond into today's present worth.
=-pv(rate,nper,pmt,fv)
rate is the yield to maturity of 6.50% divided by 2 since the bond pays interest semi-annually i.e 3.25%
nper is the number of coupon payments the bond would pay which is 7 years multiplied by 2 i.e 14
pmt is the semi-annual interest of the bond which is $1000*7.8%/2=$39
the fv is the face value of the bond of $1000
=-pv(6.5%/2,14,39,1000)=$1,072.19
Answer: $225,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Company acquired a mine = $970,000 of this amount,
Land value = $100,000 and remaining portion to the minerals in the mine
Ore appear to be in the mine = 12,000,000 units
Aristotle incurred development costs = $170,000
fair value of its obligation = $40,000
ore were extracted = 2,500,000 units
Units sold = 2,100,000
=
= $0.09 depletion per unit
The total amount of depletion for 2017 = depletion per unit × ore were extracted
= $0.09 × 2,500,000
= $225,000
Answer:
2. VARIED FROM PERSON TO PERSON
Explanation:
C. prototyping, does it makes sense now.
Answer:
The overview of the give scenario is described in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
- The distinction between Floor as well as Function Inspection was that these techniques are being used to eliminate and locate faulty materials until the identical happens in manufacturing. Quality is the key objective of both processes, where expectations are reviewed and evaluated to ensure that the operation is carried out correctly.
- The differences between the parties would be that the system in the Floor Inspection needs to be checked the content in the process mostly on the machine rather than at the beginning of manufacture to ensure that every device or floor is functioning correctly. This would be to ensure that the industrial automation expenses will not go out and then go hand in hand as well as the fault could've been readily identified.
- But from the other side, the Functional evaluation could have the primary purpose verified, which is something the brand is motivated to deliver. For example, an electric motor could've been verified if it has the correct performance and reliability. It doesn't inform us more about the difference throughout all sections, but somehow it provides everyone a wider understanding of both the happiness that comes from inspecting the very same item.
