Well, generally I don't agree with keeping animals in the circus.
But I guess in some rare cases, provided that the animals are really well treated (which excludes the bigger species, since they can't possibly not be stressed by the small amount of space circus offers), and provided that for whatever reason they can't live in the wild, (their environment is disappearing or they're hurt and would be rejected in a group), I guess it would be acceptable to keep them in a circus.
It would probably work best for the species that more readily socialize with humans: dogs, some monkeys. Again, this would only be acceptable if animal welfare was always in the first place, and if for examples the animals could refuse performing on a given day.
In those circumstances, a circus could provide a predator- free environment for them, which would be beneficial for the animals (but again, I am very skeptical this is ever the case).
For the purpose of this discussion, critical rationalism is defined as the way that we should approach knowledge. Critical rationalism believes that we don't have the ultimate answers and we should continue searching for them. It is modest. The search for the truth is the highest ideal. Critical rationalism does not include the need to justify your ideas. Existing rules and methods of scientific research are seen as inhibiting the search for new ideas.
<span>Critical Rationalism can be applied in the classroom by allowed every student the right to an opinion. His opinion can be criticised by other students. Through open discussion, students will learn to pursue knowledge. </span>
Amelia Earhart was born in Atchison, Kansas in 1897.
Answer:
A. Readers were deeply affected by Jackson's story.
Explanation:
In these lines, Jackson explains what the impact of her story was. She tells us that the story "The Lottery" was not the first or only story she ever wrote. However, she says that people would remember her name even if it had been. This implies that people consider the story and the author to be important enough to be remembered, which implies that readers were deeply affected by her story.
Marji confronts Ramin and forgives him, but Ramin has been indoctrinated by his family to believe a different truth about the war. When repeating the conversation to her mother, Marji reveals the gap between those who are fighting for the Shah and those who want to continue living in the ideals of Western tradition, all of which goes over Marji's head.
