1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garri49 [273]
3 years ago
6

Most people remember Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as reformers who practiced non-violent forms of protest and advocacy

. Both effectively changed the popular opinion about emotional issues for their countries and brought in a wave of change that was long overdue. But the practice of non-violent protest, or civil disobedience, started long before either Gandhi or King. It began with a quiet, shy poet who is best known for writing a lot about a pond.
Henry David Thoreau lived from 1817 until 1862, mainly in the area of Concord, Massachusetts. The issue that would tear the country apart in the 1860s had already begun dividing the nation. Thoreau was only 14 when Nat Turner led the slave rebellion in Virginia and was later hanged. In his late 20s, Thoreau began speaking against slavery in public, echoing the voices of freedmen like Frederick Douglass and Lewis Hayden.

Thoreau believed that a government that supported slavery was corrupt and immoral. He was also deeply suspicious of government. For these and other reasons, Thoreau refused to pay his poll tax for a number of years. The poll tax was a legal tax owed by every person. It was basically a tax on one's body. After not paying for years, he was at last arrested. He spent only one night in jail, however, as a relative paid the tax for him. He was reportedly furious that any tax was paid on his behalf.

It was this experience that Thoreau wrote about in an essay called "Civil Disobedience." In this essay, he argued that being moral and just came before allegiance to government. He wrote “If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law." He also felt that voting was not enough to ensure that the right thing be done. He wrote that "even voting for the right is doing nothing for it… A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance…" He felt that one had a moral responsibility to resist unjust laws.

Which best explains the purpose of the bolded sentences?

To connect the essay to his experience in prison
To describe the effects of his essay on others
To create interest in the effects of his essay
To summarize the main point of the paragraph
English
1 answer:
Marianna [84]3 years ago
5 0
I believe answers to describe the effects of his essay on other
You might be interested in
The narrator introduces John Dashwood as a "steady respectable young man" who "conducted himself with propriety
ycow [4]

The answers are his inability to love anyone but his wife and child

his susceptibility to his wife's scheming nature.

Hope this helps, have a BLESSED day! :-)

-Cutiepatutie <3

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is it important to have open-ended questions when interviewing someone?
padilas [110]

Answer:

b. To encourage full, meaningful answers

Explanation:

The open questions guarantee a much more effective result in communication, in any circumstance, and especially in an interview, since they will allow a greater flow of dialogue, with the search for complete and meaningful answers.

Open-ended questions prompt respondents to provide answers using their own words. They are created in order to get more information than possible with the use of multiple choice questions or in another closed question format.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP
mariarad [96]

Answer:

the answer for this question is A

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To evaluate the effectiveness of an argument the reader needs to assess whether the authors readons and evidence are
icang [17]

Answer:

<em>To evaluate the effectiveness of an argument the reader needs to check if the read and evidences of the author are true and if the logic used in the argument is valid.</em>

Explanation:

The effectiveness of an argument will depend first in the premises, if they are true or false, in this stage you should check sources, facts and evidences to see how reliable is it. The second stage is to check the logic applied, many arguments had false reasoning, which make then invalid or what it is called logic fallacies. If an argument is valid but the premises are not true it won’t be an effective argument, is the premises are true but the logic applied is not correct it won’t be an effective argument too.

5 0
3 years ago
Help me ,pls!<br> .........................
jeka57 [31]
Hey i hope this helps!
A
D
A
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Historical fiction is a branch of fiction that deals with historical plots, characters, and setting. Not every detail in a work
    9·1 answer
  • I need some help in English 1.
    5·2 answers
  • What is the story starter of "The Monkey's Paw"?
    12·2 answers
  • Which sentence contains a misplaced or dangling modifier?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Where does plasma exist naturally<br> on Earth?
    9·1 answer
  • Without pertinacity, a person will never ____.
    12·1 answer
  • The boys have taken the money. Please run after ​
    12·2 answers
  • Defundthepolice is this okay??
    5·2 answers
  • What is a Correlative Conjunction?<br> type your answer and use it in a sentence.
    9·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from The Odyssey Which elements of epic poetry are shown in this excerpt? Check all that apply.
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!