Answer:
652 and 4
Step-by-step explanation:
the product is the total
The given congruency of the sides
and
and
and
as well
as the congruency of the common side
gives.
ΔBEL ≅ ΔLOB by SSS congruency postulate
<h3>Which values correctly completes the table?</h3>
The completed two column proof is presented as follows;
Statement
Reasons
1.
1. Given
2.
≅
2.
3.
3. <u>Reflexive property of congruency</u>
4. ΔBEL ≅ ΔLOB
4. <u>SSS congruency postulate</u>
Side-Side-Side, SSS, congruency postulate states that if three sides of
one triangle are congruent to three sides of another triangle, the two
triangles are congruent.
Learn more about different congruency postulates here:
brainly.com/question/1495556
The given pair of lines are not perpendicular.
<h3>What is a line?</h3>
The line is a curve showing the shortest distance between 2 points.
5x - 5y = -2 - - - - - (1)
Transform the equation into standard form,
5x + 2 = 5y
y = 5x /5 + 2/5
y = x + 2/5
The slope of equation 1 is
and intercept c = 2 / 5
Similarly
x + 2y = 4 - - - - - - - -(2)
Transform it into standard form
y = -x/2 + 4 /2
y = -x / 2 + 2
Slope of the equation 2
= -1 / 2 and intercept c = 2
Slope of line 1 * slope of line 2 = 1 * -1/2 = -1/2
Since the lines are not perpendicular because the pair of lines does not satisfy the property of perpendicular lines i.e

Thus, the given pair of lines are not perpendicular.
Learn more about lines here:
brainly.com/question/2696693
#SPJ1
Answer:
Second choice:


Fifth choice:


Step-by-step explanation:
Let's look at choice 1.


I'm going to subtract 1 on both sides for the first equation giving me
. I will replace the
in the second equation with this substitution from equation 1.

Expand using the distributive property and the identity
:




So this not the desired result.
Let's look at choice 2.


Solve the first equation for
by dividing both sides by 2:
.
Let's plug this into equation 2:



This is the desired result.
Choice 3:


Solve the first equation for
by adding 3 on both sides:
.
Plug into second equation:

Expanding using the distributive property and the earlier identity mentioned to expand the binomial square:



Not the desired result.
Choice 4:


I'm going to solve the bottom equation for
since I don't want to deal with square roots.
Add 3 on both sides:

Divide both sides by 2:

Plug into equation 1:

This is not the desired result because the
variable will be squared now instead of the
variable.
Choice 5:


Solve the first equation for
by subtracting 1 on both sides:
.
Plug into equation 2:

Distribute and use the binomial square identity used earlier:



.
This is the desired result.