Answer:
161 units
Explanation:
Economic order quantity = √[(2 x annual demand x orderign cost) / annual holding cost per unit]
annual demand = 500 units
ordering cost = $1,000
holding cost = $550 x 7% = $38.50
EOQ = √[(2 x 500 x $1,000) / $38.50] = 161.16 units ≈ 161 units
Answer: The contingency approach
Explanation:
The contingency approach is one of the type of management theory that helps in understanding the various types of principles in an organization and it is also refers as the situational approach.
The main objective of the contingency approach is that it provide manager the different types of ways to give reaction on the given issue and different types of situation.
According to the question, the contingency approach helps in providing the different types of effective ideas to the manager where they facing different types of problems in an organization.
Therefore, contingency approach is the correct answer.
The percentage increase in the total sales for 2006 is 15% while the increase in sales of the trench coats is 23.3%; therefore the percentage increase in total sales of trench coats is 8.3% faster.
Computation:
1. The total amount of sales for 2006 and 2007:


2. Now, the percentage increase will be determined for the total number of coats and trench coats:
For the total number of coats, the values used will be the total sales of 2006, and total sales of 2007.

For the trench coats the values used will be the sale of trench coats in 2006 and 2007.

3. Now, the net percentage increase in sales due to the trench coats is computed as follows:

Therefore, the correct option is option B. Sales of trench coats increased 8. 3 percentage points faster than total coat sales.
To know more about percentages of increase in sales, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/45525
Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
For a, first we calculate the credit multiplier of the economy,
Credit multiplier = 1 / reserve ratio
Credit multiplier = 1 / 0.25 = 4
This means that any change in money supply will be 4 times as much in the economy, hence to induce a change of $120 billion, the Fed will decrease the money supply by 120/4 = $30 billion. This will increase the interest rates just enough to stabilize aggregate demand.
For b, we again start by calculating the credit multiplier.
Credit multiplier = 1/0.10 = 10
Since the Fed want to stimulate investment, it needs to use an expansionary monetary policy.
The Fed thus increases the money supply by 150/10 = $15 billion.
This will have the total effect of 150 billion on the whole thus achieving the Fed's objectives.
Hope that helps.