Answer:
I think that you are missing parts of your question as it is just a statement
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Check the explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Going by the first attached image below we reject H_o against H_1 if obs.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01882/01882716f51fda00f19277f23d014ff67e35e152" alt="T > t_{\alpha /2;n-1}"
here obs.T=1.879
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8f00/f8f005ed1064e6a31b9f2f5fa25cd1a59d58e222" alt="\therefore obs.T \ngtr 2.447=t_{0.025;6}"
we accept
at 5% level of significance.
i.e there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the special study program is more effective at 5% level of significance.
1.
this problem is simillar to the previous one except the alternative hypothesis.
Let X_i's denote the bonuses given by female managers and Y_i's denote the bonuses given by male managers.
we assume that
independently
We want to test data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7030f/7030ff40e7befd1f416dd1aa3107c7c37b0d2e35" alt="H_0:\mu_{1}=\mu_{2} vs H_1:\mu_{1}\neq \mu_{2}"
define data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43e0c/43e0cddabcf0be2b8ab9405f2ef742f0b8a77f83" alt="D_i=X_i-Y_i , i=1(1)8"
now data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a81ac/a81ac55fc76cf28d226129a72f8245e1e6cc29b8" alt="D_i\sim N(\mu _{1}-\mu _{2}=\mu _{D},\sigma _{1}^{2}+\sigma _{2}^{2}=\sigma _{D}^{2}) , i=1(1)8"
the hypothesis becomes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2c12/d2c127dc6bcd8728f95b8080d6aa33a49beeb5c3" alt="H_0:\mu_{D}=0 vs H_1:\mu_{D}\neq 0"
in the third attached image, we use the same test statistic as before
i.e at 5% level of significance there is not enough evidence to indicate a difference in average bonuses .
Answer:
2.9
Step-by-step explanation:
Plz mark as brainliest!!!
Answer:
Imperfect substitutes
explanation:
The choices above are not perfect substitutes, meaning they can not be perfectly or directly replace the other. Imperfect substitutes are close substitutes but not perfect substitutes. Unlike perfect substitutes, imperfect substitutes satisfies same utility but has different characteristics and therefore not entirely substitutable. For example, while one may want to have the 40 marks too, he'd rather have 60 marks even if the criteria for a 60 mark score was increasingly hard.
The answer to your question is D: The result is a whole number that is neither prime nor composite.