Answer:
The estimated cost for selling and administration expenses is:
47900+52*6000=$359900
Explanation:
Audrey Corporation's cost for selling and administrative expenses present fix and variable costs. They plan a fixed cost of $47,900 and a variable cost of $52 unit.
The formula is:
SandA COST= 47900+52*Q
For April they planned to sell 6000 units.
The estimated cost for selling and administration expenses is:
47900+52*6000=$359900
If the formula is accurate the real cost of selling and administration is:
47900+52*5960=$357,820
Answer:
First National Bank = 14.6%
First United Bank.= = 14.8%
Explanation:
<em>Effective annual rate is the equivalent annual rate o where interest rate is compounded at an interval shorter than a year.</em>
It can be calculated as follows:
EAR = ( (1+r)^(n) -1) × 100
r -interest rate per period
n- number of period
EAR - Effective annual rate
First National Bank
r - interest rate per month = 13.7%/12 = 1.141%
number of period = 12 months
EAR =( (1+011141)^(12) - 1) × 100
= 0.145938395 × 100
= 14.59
= 14.6%
First United Bank.
r- interest rate per quarter - 14%/4 = 3.5% per quarter
n- number of quarters = 4
EAR = ((1+0.035)^(4)- 1) × 100
= 0.147523001 × 100
= 14.8%
Answer:
D. $605,500
Explanation:
The computation of the expected balance in retained earnings on the 2018 is shown below:
The ending balance of retained earning = Beginning balance of retained earnings + net income - dividend paid
= $533,500 + $112,000 - $40,000
= $605,500
We simply applied the above formula so that the ending balance could arrive by considering all the items given in the question
Answer:
<em>Labour rate variance = $260 favourable</em>
Explanation:
<em>The rate variance would be the difference between the standard labour cost of the 2,300 units sold and the actual labour cost</em>
Standard labour cost (3600/1200× 2300)<em> 6,900</em>
<em>Actual labour cost </em><u><em>6, 640</em></u>
<em>labour rate variance </em><u><em> $260</em></u><em> favourable</em>
The variance is favourable because the StuckinMyHouse book company saved $260 as a result of of his actual cost been less than the expected cost.
Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
