Answer:
-15/6
Step-by-step explanation:
-3 1/3+5/6
5/6 - 3 1/3
=> 5/6 - 10/3
=> 5/6 - 20/6
=> -15/6
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
<h3>
Answer is ED</h3>
note: ED is the same as DE. The order of the segment letters does not matter.
============================================
Explanation:
In the sequence ABC, the letter B is the second letter and A is the first.
So the corresponding segment to BA will have its first slot be the second letter of DEF, and its second slot be the first letter of DEF. That's how I'm getting ED for the answer. It is the same as DE because it's the same segment.
The corresponding sides are congruent due to the CPCTC which stands for "corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent".
Dependent, because you're changing the probability
The absolute change is the difference: 6.88 - 7.25 = -0.37
The rate of change is that divided by the originalprice x 100
Ratre of change: (-0.37/7.25 )*100 = -4.93%
