Wilbert Awdry Christopher Awdry and Britt Allcroft
The sentence that best describes the effects of the Louisiana Purchase on the United States is that it caused the size of the United States to double, providing vast areas for farming. Thus, Option D is the correct answer.
<h3>What do you know about Louisiana Purchase?</h3>
The acquisition of imperial rights to the western half of the Mississippi River basin from France via way of means of America in 1803 is known as the Louisiana Purchase.
The deal granted the USA the only authority to attain the land from its indigenous inhabitants, both via way of means of settlement or via way of means of conquest.
Therefore, Option D is the correct answer.
learn more about Louisiana Purchase:
brainly.com/question/866149
#SPJ1
Explanation:
I guess can be specific this
B. To show opposition to British economic actions
This is the correct answer, I made sure. :)
Answer:
The question is incomplete without options. These were the views of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist.
The Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay created a government based on federalism to limit the power of the National Government to limit the possibility of governmental abuses of power. Anti-federalists represented Thomas Jefferson were mainly concerned with the rights of individuals and states.
The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay intended to support the ratification of the United States Constitution.
After the Constitution was written, it needed to be ratified by 9 states, those who supported it were the Federalists while those against it were Anti-Federalists and proposed Articles of Confederation. At the conventions in 1789, arguments were canvassed by both different parties.
The Federalists felt the new Constitution was sufficient and therefore did not want a bill of rights. They defended the weakness contained in the Constitution and stated that amendments will be effected if necessary.
The anti-federalists wanted a bill of rights.
The Argument canvassed at the ratification debates by anti-federalists to justify their position was that their position represents the protection of individual liberties, limits must be placed on the power of the federal government.
