The source at the bottom would be information given by the people involved in a case.
The information given by the people that directly impacted by a certain case would most likely be designed to provide the most benefit for those people.
This is why united states operates on assumption that an accused would be innocent until he/she is proven guilty.
Information given by the people involved could only be held<em><u> as something to be confirmed </u></em>by other evidence or witnesses.
Christmas,Hanukkah,ashura,
Sorry if it’s wrong
Yes Fredric Douglas's account is a trustworthy source for knowing about John Brown's intentions.
<h3>Who was Fredrick Douglas?</h3>
This man was an abolitionist, a speaker and a publisher in the United States.
He led the march to end slavery during the civil war in the country and before it.
His account is trustworthy due to the fact that he had personal relations with John Brown.
Read more on Fredrick Douglas here: brainly.com/question/13896424
Answer:
Quantitative research method
Explanation:
Quantitative research methods emphasize objective measurements and the statistical, mathematical, or numerical analysis of data collected through polls, questionnaires, and surveys, or by manipulating pre-existing statistical data using computational techniques.
Answer: Nationalism.
Explanation:
Nationalism is high identification with a nation (usually the nation in which it was born) and a high sense of its worth, and unconditional support for its interests. Diametrically, the belief that other nations have little value.
Nationalism includes an idealized sense of the nation, which includes the belief that the nation has a historical or divine superiority that gives it rights over other nations.
<em>An example of nationalism is Nazi nationalism, they believed that Germany had superior rights that allowed them to rule over other inferior nations.</em>
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
