False,
" I am talking about 20-30+ millions lines of code, software at the scale and complexity of Autodesk Maya for example.
If you freeze the development as long as it needs to be, can you actually fix all the bugs until there is simply not a single bug, if such a thing could be verified by computers? What are the arguments for and against the existence of a bug-free system?
Because there is some notion that every fix you make creates more bugs, but I don't think that's true.
By bugs I meant from the simplest typos in the UI, to more serious preventative bugs that has no workaround. For example a particular scripting function calculates normal incorrectly. Also even when there are workarounds, the problem still has to be fixed. So you could say you can do this particular thing manually instead of using the provided function but that function still has to be fixed."
work cited:
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/195571/is-it-possible-to-reach-absolute-zero-bug-state-for-large-scale-software
This belief reflects an omnipotent view of management.
Answer:
Explanation: What is that word you typed?
Butterfly one I forgot the name metapods evolution
Answer: Multi-user issue
Explanation: A database management system scheme can have multi-user issue when the designing of the system is not made properly. The multi user issue rises when the users concurrently access the data from the database and related error get invoked due to some reason like repeatable reading issue, serialization, etc.
The reading problem is usually can be related to reading of the database in uncommitted manner, uncommitted reading, repeatedly reading etc.Thus, Cora and Owen are accessing the database concurrently which can create multi-user issue.
