The correct answer is D. Between
Explanation:
An infinitive is the basic form of a verb compound by the preposition "to" and the bare verb, for example, to eat, to run, to go or to cook. In the case of a split infinitive a word or groups of words is inserted between the preposition "to" and the bare infinitive which is usually an adverb, for example, "she was advised to slowly run" in which "to run" has been separated or split by the adverb "slowly". Thus, a split occurs if one or more words are inserted between the two parts of an infinitive.
In the first murder, he poisons the victim. On the second attempt, he tries to send a bomb to the victim.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Lord Arthur receives a prophecy that he will be an assassin.
- He is engaged and eager for marriage, but he is afraid to marry without having completed his destiny and therefore decides to become a murderer as soon as possible.
- So he tries to poison his aunt and send dynamite to a university dean.
- Both attempts fail and he is unable to murder either victim.
With this, we can see the theme that we should not try to manipulate fate, we should just wait for it to happen at the right time.
More information about the theme of a story at the link:
brainly.com/question/10704174
Science fiction genre are: (sci-fi), for example <span>speculative </span>fiction.
Functional texts are the texts which include do-it-yourself and how to do instructions. It includes such as directories, menus, forms to fill and so forth. It is used by the reader in order to confirm for the next step and what is needed to do.
Therefore, of the following statements which describe a functional text is
The primary purpose is to provide information to perform a task.
It presents facts, principles, theories, and reasoning related to a subject
Answer:
Summary Of Rethinking The Wild By Christopher Solomon Essay
1530 Words7 Pages
Humanity co-exists with nature in a relationship that periodically shifts between symbiotic and parasitic. We maintain this relationship in order to survive. In exchange, we carefully monitor how our behavior alters the natural environment and affects those living within it. This responsibility is the price we pay for our species’ sentience and dominance. To help fulfill our duty, America established the 1954 Wilderness Act in hopes of becoming passive “guardians” of nature instead of encroaching “gardeners.” However, the Wilderness Act has failed. In his article, “Rethinking the Wild”, Christopher Solomon questions the effectiveness of the law and correctly concludes that, after fifty years of dormancy, mankind must take an active role in environmental protection, the role of the gardener. Though critics may argue that the passivity of the “guardian” should be maintained, realistically, little can be done to preserve the environment when we refuse to do anything. Because mankind has a greater stake in the wilderness than we realize, we must assume a proactive role in protecting the wilderness out of respect for nature and our own ethical standards.
Boundaries and Investments
Assume for the sake of our argument that nature holds no intrinsic value. Why, then, is the wilderness worth protecting? Truthfully, the wilderness can be a valuable indicator of the planet’s overall health, which is not easily gauged in industrialized and populated areas due to human influence.
