Well what would have happened is France would have gained back some of their land and gotten hold of some important forts of Britian
Generally speaking, economic policy must strike a balance between ideals and "pragmatism", since it is not always possible for a country or a state to make realistic economic goals that are beneficial to most of the population.
His power of how the government would be best is the form of what it is today. The president that we have runs the country not alone like a king, but with others. The government we have approves or denies policies the president want to be in effect with a majority vote. These are just a few of these impacts that Locke gave us from the past to today.
That was probably terrible; I'm bad at rephrasing stuff but hope that helped
Answer:
If you don't keep track you'll overdraft and spend too much on something like food when you need to pay your electric bill
Explanation:
If you don't keep track of your spending, you could go bankrupt.
Answer:
The experiments that refutes the criticisms of the Reinforcement theory are
- <em>The study on the Amazon tribe that has no numeracy, which was actually meant to disprove Chomsky, but nonetheless was only conducted because of him. </em>
- <em>The non-response of B.F SKINNER to NOAM CHOMSKY 's criticism of his Verbal behaviour - language acquisition.</em>
<em />
Explanation:
- <em>The study on the Amazon tribe that has no numeracy, which was actually meant to disprove Chomsky, but nonetheless was only conducted because of him. </em>
<em />
- <em>In fact, Skinner never bothered to write a response to Chomsky's critique of his Verbal Behavior saying rather immaturely that he had "no inclination to do so at all" because to respond he "should've had to read it and had no intention of doing that" and because he "found it boring." </em>
