1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
3 years ago
11

The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Nixon resulted in Nixon’s impeachment. resignation. appeal of the decision. sec

ond term as president.
History
2 answers:
Anvisha [2.4K]3 years ago
6 0

The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Nixon resulted in Nixon’s resignation. United States v. Nixon, 418 A,683 which was released in 1974, was the United States Supreme Court’s important case which the effect was a unanimous judgment in opposition to President Richard Nixon, commanded him to send recorded tapes and other summon materials to the federal district court.

 

EXPLANATION:

Decision of the US Supreme Court in the United States v. Richard M. Nixon was a crucial case in U.S. constitutional history and the history of jurisprudence of American. Following indictments by a federal jury of seven senior members of President Richard M. Nixon's administration, and prosecution by prosecutors for recordings made clandestinely by the president's conversation he held at the Oval Office, the president rejected to submit the tapes, citing " executive privilege” as the legal basis under which he would reject to oblige with the judicial branch of government.

 

In the United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court, on July 24, 1974, refused the notion that the government's Executive Branch could be invulnerable from the legal requests of other branches of government, where in this case is the Judiciary. While acknowledging that the concept of executive privilege was valid within certain limits which were strictly forbidden, especially those involving foreign affairs and national security, the Court refused Nixon's argument that executive privilege could spread to domestic political matters. In short, the decision of the Supreme Court in the United States v. Nixon confirmed the Founder's intention concerning the partition of powers between branches of government.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Which Supreme Court case established that it was unconstitutional to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant?brainly.com/question/406748

• In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that Gideon had been denied his rights because? brainly.com/question/10004183

KEYWORDS : Supreme Court, United States v. Nixon, Nixon

Subject  : History

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : United States v. Nixon

bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
5 0
The correct answer here is the second option.

The main issue here was the fight over the extent of executive power and whether or not president Nixon need to to hand over tape recording that the court ordered him to deliver. The Supreme Court voted that Nixon had to hand over the materials related to the Watergate investigation. After this ruling, Nixon fearing impeachment, resigned. 
You might be interested in
20 pts and brainilest :)
Vadim26 [7]
Chastity, obedience, and poverty!!!!
6 0
2 years ago
How did Common Sense influence the Declaration of Independence?
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

a) by using most of the language and format of the Declaration

Explanation:

Thomas Paine published Common Sense in January 1776 support of the Patriot cause. Using clear, plain language, Paine rallied the colonists to support the break from Britain. In arguing for American independence, Paine denounced the monarchy and argued that people are born in to a state of equality.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What art form is considered a solely Japanese creation?
Anarel [89]

Explanation:

he was the only person in a group of a dozen other members to do it and the only way they would work

8 0
3 years ago
Should the United States increase aid to Central America?
Elden [556K]

This additional funding brings the total U.S. humanitarian assistance for Central America and Mexico to more than $331 million for Fiscal Year 2021. ... The United States is the largest single donor of humanitarian aid in Central America and Mexico and to asylum seekers, refugees, and vulnerable migrants in the region.

5 0
2 years ago
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?
ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

the answer is C

Explanation:

It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed. It was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms. It was unnecessary because the new government had limited power.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did Britain use the East India Company to take over India during the era of imperialism?
    5·1 answer
  • Most of the native Americans joined the side of ___(country) in the french and indian war
    11·1 answer
  • Why did England move toward limited monarchy as the 1600 approached while France did not?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following events would most likely cause an increase in Indian nationalism?
    14·2 answers
  • The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People was founded based largely on the beliefs of
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement is true?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the name for the american and british response to the soviet blockade of a german city?
    6·1 answer
  • What caused the final fall of the Byzantine Empire? Slavic invasions Iconoclasts Justinian's Plague Attack from the Ottomans
    14·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP!
    7·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP<br> I’ll give brainliest
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!