1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
3 years ago
11

The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Nixon resulted in Nixon’s impeachment. resignation. appeal of the decision. sec

ond term as president.
History
2 answers:
Anvisha [2.4K]3 years ago
6 0

The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Nixon resulted in Nixon’s resignation. United States v. Nixon, 418 A,683 which was released in 1974, was the United States Supreme Court’s important case which the effect was a unanimous judgment in opposition to President Richard Nixon, commanded him to send recorded tapes and other summon materials to the federal district court.

 

EXPLANATION:

Decision of the US Supreme Court in the United States v. Richard M. Nixon was a crucial case in U.S. constitutional history and the history of jurisprudence of American. Following indictments by a federal jury of seven senior members of President Richard M. Nixon's administration, and prosecution by prosecutors for recordings made clandestinely by the president's conversation he held at the Oval Office, the president rejected to submit the tapes, citing " executive privilege” as the legal basis under which he would reject to oblige with the judicial branch of government.

 

In the United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court, on July 24, 1974, refused the notion that the government's Executive Branch could be invulnerable from the legal requests of other branches of government, where in this case is the Judiciary. While acknowledging that the concept of executive privilege was valid within certain limits which were strictly forbidden, especially those involving foreign affairs and national security, the Court refused Nixon's argument that executive privilege could spread to domestic political matters. In short, the decision of the Supreme Court in the United States v. Nixon confirmed the Founder's intention concerning the partition of powers between branches of government.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Which Supreme Court case established that it was unconstitutional to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant?brainly.com/question/406748

• In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that Gideon had been denied his rights because? brainly.com/question/10004183

KEYWORDS : Supreme Court, United States v. Nixon, Nixon

Subject  : History

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : United States v. Nixon

bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
5 0
The correct answer here is the second option.

The main issue here was the fight over the extent of executive power and whether or not president Nixon need to to hand over tape recording that the court ordered him to deliver. The Supreme Court voted that Nixon had to hand over the materials related to the Watergate investigation. After this ruling, Nixon fearing impeachment, resigned. 
You might be interested in
Anti-Federalists argued that?
lys-0071 [83]

The correct answer is: Option B. It was impossible to separate government into equal branches.

The Anti-Federalists stated that a strong, centralized federal government would equate tyranny, and therefore its powers needed to be divided in separate branches. These individuals sought to minimize the power of the centralized government, and at the same time, provide more to the state governments.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was Anne Hutchinson tried by the General Court of Massachusetts Bay?
Westkost [7]

In 1637, Anne Hutchinson was put on trial by the General Court of Massachusetts Bay for her blasphemous claims or disagreement with the teaching of the Anglican church. Anne practiced the beliefs of the Puritan faith. After a two day trial by the General Court of Massachusetts Bay a guilty verdict was delivered and Anne was exiled.  

3 0
3 years ago
How tall was the from line of trenches<br> usually?<br> 5 ft<br> 20 ft<br> 10 ft
poizon [28]
The trenches were 5ft
3 0
3 years ago
Why president lincoln was opposed to the wade-davis bill?
Darya [45]
Abraham Lincoln vetoed the Wade-Davis Bill of 1864 because he felt it imposed a harsh punishment on the Confederate states that rebelled from the Union. Radical Republicans proposed the bill to punish the Southern states during the Reconstruction phase after the Civil War ended.
6 0
3 years ago
After Napoleon returned to Paris, Russia, Great Britain, ___ and <br> ___ pledged to defeat him.
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

Why did Napoleon fall from power, and how did Europe respond by his defeat? ... Europe responded to his defeat by having the rulers start to respond to Old Order and in 1814 at the Congress of Vienna, Great Britain, Austria, Prussia, and Russia arrange a final peace settlement.

hope I helped Man plz GIVE BRAIN-LY-EST

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one factor that contributed to the collapse of the soviet union?
    11·2 answers
  • What European beliefs and values might have led Las Cosas to portray<br> native peoples in this way?
    13·1 answer
  • When was a state obligated to follow the Constitution?
    12·2 answers
  • The governor may not veto a bill until it has already been approved by both houses of the legislature.
    11·2 answers
  • All of the following statements are true of King Henry IV of France EXCEPT: a. Henry IV was a Huguenot. b. The French economy th
    11·1 answer
  • Some historians call slavery the "unfinished business" of the 1787 Convention. Write a paragraph explaining why.
    15·1 answer
  • Who owned Missouri after the French and indian war ?
    8·1 answer
  • Who was the american commander at omaha and utah beaches?
    5·1 answer
  • Help pls!! True of False??
    14·2 answers
  • ?? is a political system headed by a dictator that calls for extreme nationalism and often racism with no tolerance of oppositio
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!