Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can conclude that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI, because you can see/interpret that there all the angles are congruent with one another, like with vertical angles (∠GIH and ∠KIJ) and alternate interior angles (∠H and ∠J, ∠G and ∠K).
We also know that we have two congruent sides, since it provides the information that line GK bisects line HJ, meaning that they have been split evenly (they have been split, with even/same lengths).
<u><em>So now we have three congruent angles, and two congruent sides. This is enough to prove that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI,</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
Answer:
5 apples to 4 bananas
Step-by-step explanation:
Put numbers in order: 4,5,6,6,7,8,9,9,10,10,12,12,14,15
Cut the list into two equal parts: 4,5,6,6,7,8,9 and 9,10,10,12,12,14,15
Find middle numbers: 4,5,6,6,7,8,9 and 9,10,10,12,12,14,15
Lower quartile: 6
Upper quartile: 12
The difference of the values of the first and third quartiles of the data set is 12 - 6 = 6
So basycilly slope intercept form is y=mx+b where m=slope and b=y intercept
slope=-1
subsiute
y=-1x+b
y=-x+b
so we are given the point (-3,2)
x=-3 and y=2 is one solution
subsitue and solve for b
2=-(-3)+b
2=3+b
subtract 3 from both sides
-1=b
the slopt inercetp form is y=-x-1
-3x-4<19
19+4=23
3x<23
÷3 ÷3
×= > 23/3 or 7.6^87
