The answer is: The Constitution
The constitution that each country have will always become a basis of what laws can be passed by the government in that country.
IN united states, all of the 50 states have the power to create their own law in order to maintain the order of each states' citizens. BUT, all the laws that they make cannot violate the constitution in any way. The same thing applied for the laws created by the federal government.
Because of this, we say that at the most fundamental level, this relationship is governed by the constitution.
A purely democratic government would entail a pure vote including all people, of which the decision is made based on the majority. There would be no balance in this situation to account for even a large amount of minority voters.
Explanation:
1. The person who supported the state rights during the 18th century in the United States was that right of the state proves more powerful than the rights of the federal government.
2. The Southerns felt that Lincoln's election was illegitimate as his name was not present in the ballots of the slave states to which he was most concerned. His aim to abolish slavery in the slave states and his name was not in the ballots of the slave states.
3. Secession is an action in which the withdrawal is performed from the group.
In 1860, the eleven states of Southern withdrew from the Union called secession. The sugar planters from the Southern were concerned with this secession as it would lead to losing the protective tariff which could directly affect the market and prices of the crop.
Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
