Answer:
Ruling out
Explanation:
I'm not really sure myself but ruling out answers one by one has made me come up with an answer. It's not C, because the Dalai Llama (The leader of Buddism) and Siddartha Gautama (the Founder of Buddhism) are both male. I believe that it isnt A. because the Dalai Llama always inhabited tibet which is in China, not India. I believe that it's B. because Chinese culture is very family orientated and Siddartha Gautama left his family behind to study and found Buddhism and become enlightened. So in short answer is probably, B
Jerome C. Wakefield, psychologist at the School of Social Work at Columbia University criticized the (then popular) definition of psychological disorder as “statistically unexpectable distress or disability”. In his view, this definition failed to capture the idea of dysfunction. To Wakefield, a dysfunction is a condition in which some internal mechanism is not functioning in the way it was designed to function. He proposed this definition in 1992.
Answer: b) other things equal
Explanation:
Ceteris paribus means all other things being equal. This statement is majorly used in discussion to ascertain the fact that the decision that is about to be made will not affect other decisions that has already been made.
President Trump created a task force to prioritize building projects in the U.S. He appointed specialists to study this problem. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is task force?</h3>
Generally, a group of soldiers assembled for a specific mission.
In conclusion, As part of his agenda, President Trump established a special committee to evaluate and rank all active construction projects in the United States. To investigate, he tasked experts with taking on the job.
Read more about task force
brainly.com/question/9980720
#SPJ1
Answer:
Preconventional
Explanation:
The pre-conventional level of moral reasoning is especially common in children, although adults can also exhibit this level of reasoning. Reasoners in the pre-conventional level judge the morality of an action by its direct consequences. The pre-conventional level consists of the first and second stages of moral development, and are purely concerned with the self in an egocentric manner.
In stage one, individuals focus on the direct consequences that their actions will have for themselves. For example, an action is perceived as morally wrong if the person who commits it gets punished. The worse the punishment for the act is, the more 'bad' the act is perceived to be. In addition, there is no recognition that others' points of view are any different from one's own view. This stage may be viewed as a kind of authoritarianism.
Stage two espouses the what's in it for me position, right behaviour being defined by what is in one's own best interest. Stage two reasoning shows a limited interest in the needs of others, but only to a point where it might further one's own interests, such as you scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours. In stage two concern for others is not based on loyalty or intrinsic respect. Lacking a perspective of society in the pre-conventional level, this should not be confused with social contract (stage five), as all actions are performed to serve one's own needs or interests. For the stage two theorist, the perspective of the world is often seen as morally relative.
