1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pani-rosa [81]
3 years ago
5

Why did aristotle feel that humans should not put much faith in natural philosophy?

Social Studies
1 answer:
dusya [7]3 years ago
3 0
Aristotle feels that way because he believed that M<span>ost of the creation could not be studied and therefore lay beyond human understanding.
He believed that some things are meant to be unknown by the limit of our intellectual capabilities and we should only focus on things that we could control with our current capabilities.</span>
You might be interested in
Write an essay on Marx’s and Weber’s approaches to social stratification. In a paragraph for each theory, elaborate on the key p
Serhud [2]

Answer:

Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.

Explanation:

For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.

Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.

Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.

5 0
3 years ago
One goal of networking is to:
MArishka [77]
The goal is resource sharing
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
11)
kkurt [141]

Answer:

population density

Explanation:

Because many people travel from rural areas to urban areas in search of greener pastures therefore making the population rise

4 0
2 years ago
How do you explain the term “Human” to the Alien?
strojnjashka [21]

Answer:

Aliens are the creatures that come from different planet. If we have to describe ourselves to an "alien", we are going to explain our physique, mental situations and our social behavior to them.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Describe the importance of traditional skills and technology
Sati [7]
Traditional skills are an invisible thread to our ancestors and understanding how things are made helps us better understand why we are who we are. Traditional skills are an invisible thread to our ancestors and understanding how things are made helps us better understand why we are who we are.
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The estimated population of India is _______???
    15·2 answers
  • You are driving on a two lane highway and the vehicle behind you wants to pass you should
    15·2 answers
  • Help me help me help me Help me help me help me Help me help me help me
    7·2 answers
  • A client was recently in a motor vehicle accident, which resulted in an amputation of the right leg. The client is withdrawn, do
    8·1 answer
  • How does south asia differ from the rest of the eastern hemisphere
    13·1 answer
  • Egbert is a quiet child who is very slow to adapt to change. However, if he is introduced gradually to new people or situations,
    11·1 answer
  • What tools would you use to find evidence of early human societies in Africa or Asia? List the tools or methods you would use an
    14·1 answer
  • MyPlate is based on the concept that a single dietary modification plan is appropriate for all individuals. MyPlate is based on
    10·2 answers
  • All circuits must have three things: energy source, wire, and a generator
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the consequences of rapid population.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!