Answer:
The event that started "Bleeding Kansas" was the passing of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
Explanation:
At the heart of the conflict between pro and anti slavery sides was the question of whether Kansas, until then a single Territory, would enter the Union as a "free" state or, on the contrary, as a slave state. In this sense, Bleeding Kansas was a proxy dispute between Northerners and Southerners around the issue of slavery on the territory of the United States.
The United States Congress had long struggled to maintain a delicate balance between slavers and abolitionists. The events that would go down in history as Bleeding Kansas were triggered in 1854 by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, canceling the Missouri Compromise (which had until then guaranteed a balance between supporters and opponents of the slavery) and proclaiming that the status of the new state of Kansas would be determined by popular sovereignty.
This decision provoked the massive arrival on Kansas of activists of both sides who clashed violently, in the guerrilla mode, for the control of it. On November 21, 1855 the Wakarusa War began when an anti-slavery was killed by a pro-slave. On May 21, 1856, a group of Border Ruffians sacked Lawrence, a small town with anti-slavery theses. The next day, in the Senate, Preston Brooks, a Democrat from South Carolina, knocked out Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts senator and supporter of abolition. On the night of May 24, 1856, John Brown, who arrived in Kansas in October 1855 to fight slavery, slaughtered at Pottawatomie Creek a group of alleged slavers. On June 2, Brown captured about 30 slavery supporters at the Battle of Black Jack. In August 1856, thousands of slavery supporters, organized as armies, invaded Kansas. John Brown and his followers fought a part of it at the Battle of Osawatomie. Hostilities continued for two months until Brown and his followers left Kansas. A total of 56 people were killed in the Bleeding Kansas events.
Here are a couple of different perspectives:
Native Americans
People, like the Native Americans, would see this event as a catastrophe since Columbus and his men slaughtered many Native Americans during his time in the Americas. He also discriminated against the Native Americans. This would lead to the harsh treatment of Native Americans for generations.
Colonists
Others would argue that the voyage was a huge accomplishment. This was the first time that people from the east side of the world ventured into the west side. This would lead to many great things like the creation of the United States. People to this day celebrate this voyage with a national holiday, Columbus Day.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "within a few hundred miles of the coast." Most people in Brazil live within a few hundred miles of the coast. The location of the area made it the people to live a <span>few hundred miles of the coast</span>
Answer:
The French Revolution is one of the greatest change in France that gave them Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.
Explanation:
Other nations were willing to fight to restore the old regime that Louis XVI represented because, it was the first seed sowed to remove monarchy rule and the ancient regime of France.
The colonizing by West and their way of government was practiced all over the world, putting the common people in great struggle, the rise of the French Revolution was not just the freedom of one nation but a wake up call for the whole community which was under the rule of West.
The French Revolution is one of the greatest change in France that gave them Liberty, Equality and Fraternity and passed over to the whole world as an inspiration to attain their freedom.
Answer:
The right answer is: b) Feelings of partisan politics had practically disappeared.
Explanation:
The presidency of James Monroe is remembered as the "Era of Good Feelings" and it can be associated to two things. Following the War of of 1812, there was a sense of national purpose and a wish for unity among Americans. Besides, Monroe appointed officials to lower posts regardless of partisan colors; this led to a reduction in political tensions and a growth of sympathy for him. The existing political parties even reduced their activities.
