Answer:
a) 29%
Explanation:
The formula to compute the unemployment rate is shown below:
Unemployment rate = (Number of Unemployed workers) ÷ (Total labor force) × 100
where,
Number of unemployed = 40 million
Total labor force = Number of unemployed + number of employed
= 40 million + 100 million
So, the unemployment rate would be
= (40 million) ÷ (140 million) × 100
= 29%
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
Profit earning ratio of MMC = 10%
Explanation:
Given:
Current stock price = $100
Yearly profit on each share = $10
Profit earning ratio (P\E ratio) =?
Computation of profit earning ratio:
Profit earning ratio (P\E ratio) = Current stock price / Yearly profit on each share
Profit earning ratio (P\E ratio) = $100 / $10
Profit earning ratio (P\E ratio) = 10
It is computed that MMC's Profit earning ratio is nearer to the industry averages P/E ratio so, the investor can wait for some time to purchase this stock.
Answer:
0.75 wheat
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the cost of the next best option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives.
the opportunity cost of producing cars, is the quantity of wheat that would have to be forgone to produce one car
18 / 24 = 0.75 wheat
Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
A consumer price index measures the change in the price level of weighted average of a basket of goods and services purchased by the consumers.
GDP deflator measures the change in the price of all domestically produced goods and services.
A change in the price of domestically produced industrial robots will be included in the GDP deflator as it includes the prices of all domestically produced goods and services.
But it will not be included in the CPI as the industrial robots are not purchased by consumers in households, they are not consumer goods.
