Answer:
Hello. You did not put the answer options, but according to "The Beginning of Wisdom" the ministry of the main prophets of the old testament is based on passing on a message about the coming of a savior descended from David, besides being based on the judgment of Israel's sins. Thus, concepts that do not fit these two types of message are concepts that are inconsistent with the ministry of these prophets.
Explanation:
The Old Testament prophets are known as Messianic prophets and their ministries were based on very similar messages that pointed out Israel's flaws and the need for a trial to be held so that Israel could get rid of all the problems caused by sin. These prophets claimed that Israel turned away from God, but that God is merciful and that he would send a messiah a savior, who would come from the house of Daví and who would save Israel from misery, evil and sin.
<span><span>It sets a guided focus for the meeting.</span>
</span>
Northern Egypt was called Lower Egypt
Southern Egypt was called Upper Egypt
This seems backwards of what you think it would be but these names are actually because of the direction the nile river flows. Some benefits of the Nile River are 1) Fertilized crops 2) Drinking water 3) Transportation. Without those things, Egyptians would not have been able to prosper like they did. The population would be smaller and possibly nonexistent. There would be no society.
Hey there!
The country located at the Southern tip of Africa is South Africa.
Take a look at the map!
As always, it is my pleasure helping student like you!
The first alternative is correct (A).
Large corporations are publicly traded, meaning that the company is divided into shares that are distributed in the financial market to investors. These investors, in turn, delegate a team of directors who make strategic decisions of the firm, theoretically independent. However, the directors make their decisions thinking about the profit that will pass to the owners of the companies' shares, to which they report.
This model, in a way, places the responsibility of business owners in the background. In the event of a lawsuit, the company is first investigated as well as its directors. In order to reach the owners, a more complex legal process is necessary.
A recent example: a mining company caused an environmental and human catastrophe in Brazil, destroying an ecosystem and killing hundreds of people. The shareholders were not held responsible, only the company as an institution is being processed. The board was fired, but the real owners of the company suffered nothing.
