1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nuetrik [128]
3 years ago
8

Write 428,250,230 in expanded form using multiples of 10

Mathematics
1 answer:
NISA [10]3 years ago
5 0

400,000,000 + 20,000,000 + 8,000,000 + 200,000 + 50,000 + 200 + 30

You might be interested in
Use fractión strips or number lines to find each sum or difference 3 1/2 + 1 1/2
ElenaW [278]

Answer:

3 1/2 plus 1 1/2? if thats it then it would be 5 i guess

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Casey and Stephanie are planning a birthday party. They order a rectangular sheet cake that measures 24 inches by 18 inches. All
Leto [7]

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The largest square piece will be the largest factor between 24 and 18. This means the largest number that divides into 24 and 18. This number is 6. So each piece will be 6 inches by 6 inches.

6 0
3 years ago
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n > 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
X^2=1/4 please help me
skelet666 [1.2K]
X² = 1/4 ⇒√⇒ x₁ = 1/2, x₂ = -1/2
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help really bad please
yuradex [85]

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

72 = 2^3 \cdot \boxed{3^2}

27 = 3 \cdot \boxed{3^2}

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE PLEASE PLEASEE PLEASEEEEESE HELPME!?!?!? IM SO BAD AT MATH PLEASE HELP!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Who would be interested in using inequalities? What are the benefits
    13·1 answer
  • Which equations are correct
    14·1 answer
  • Find the value of x when 6-4x = 6x-8x-2.
    6·1 answer
  • Given that secant theta = Negative StartFraction 37 Over 12 EndFraction, what is the value of cotangent theta, for StartFraction
    14·2 answers
  • Winnie wrote the following riddle .I am a number between 60 and 100
    6·1 answer
  • A window in the shape of a rectangle as shown below has a width of x+5 and a length of x^2- 3x+7 express the area of the rectang
    8·1 answer
  • Need help, you know the deal lol​
    10·1 answer
  • BRIANLIEST!!!!!<br> ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
    13·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. which expression is equivalent to the given expression? assume the denominator does not equal zero. a
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!