I think B I’m
Not
Sue tho so don’t take my word on it but I think it’s B
Answer:
f(x) = -x -1
Step-by-step explanation:
You can make the correct choice by seeing which equation works for the first line of the table.
f(-1) = -(-1) -1 = 0 . . . . . the first equation works
f(-1) = -(-1) +1 = 2 . . . not zero
f(-1) = -1 -1 = -2 . . . not zero
f(-1) = 1 -(-1) = 2 . . . not zero (same as second equation)
Answer:
3x was subtracted from the left side, but 3x was subtracted from the right side. The Subtract Property of Equality states that you can subtract the same number from each side and the equation will remain true. But 3x and 3 are not the same number (unless x is 1).
x = -8/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.
Step 2: Subtract 12 from both sides.
Step 3: Divide both sides by 10.
Answer:
m∠CFD=
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
m∠CFD+m∠DFE=
------> by supplementary angles
we have
that
m∠DFE=m∠DEF=
so
m∠CFD+
m∠CFD=
Answer:
Su=10
Explaination:
So from s to u on the nunebr line is worth 2x-12. So what is s to u worth? Well. S to t on the number line = x-7. T to u =6. And 2 x is worth 12 more than s to u, using th e expression. X has to be at least 8 because otherwise the x-7 wouldn't work, and u might get s to u = 0 or a negative number.
Say x was 13, then 13 - 7 =6. So S to t =6. And r to u =6. So s to u =12. (6+6). Then check if the expression fits this answer of 12. 2x - 12. 2x = 26. 26-12=14, which doesn't match.
Let's try 14. 14-7=7. Then s to u = 7+6=13. The expression: 2x= 28. 28-12=16. 13 and 16 dont match. So we have got further away from what we need. Why don't we try going in the opposite direction. Rather than testing 13 and +1, let's now - 1 and try 12.
If x=12, then s to t =12-7=5. And s to u =6+5=11. The expression: 2x=24.-12=12. We are very close now with 11 and 12.
Lets test x=11!
S to t = 11-7=4. 4+6=10. So s to u =10.
2x=22. 22-12=10. So the expression works and the number line measurements.
The answer is su=10 and x=11.
