Answer:
a. 710,000
Explanation:
Current assets are calculated as follows:
Cash: $185,000
Accounts receivable, net $725,000
Recall that a loyal customer is to make semi-annually payments of $100000 into to the tune of $400,000 accounts receivable. For the year five balance sheet, the reclassification of o/s receivable will therefore be $200000
Therefore Total current assets = $185,000+ $725,000 - $200000 = $710,000
In JB Company's December 31, year five Balance Sheet $710,000 should be reported as current assets.
Answer:
1. More market speed
2. Reduced costs
3. better and Improved quality
Explanation:
A supplier relationship management can be explained as the process of knowing those suppliers that are really important to the growth of a business and putting into place, a system that would help in the managing of existing relationships with these important suppliers.
Organizations that are able to fully implement such relationships enjoy benefits such as
1. increased speed to the market
such relationships can help to remove delays that are caused by supply chains
2. They enjoy reduced costs
product sampling, contract negotiation, sampling of new suppliers could take a lot of time as well as money. Mistakes could even be made
3. They also enjoy quality items from the suppliers
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer: Volkswagen invested in Russia because Russia’s economy was growing rapidly and living standards were rising while the level of car ownership was still low. This made Volkswagen believe that the demand for cars would grow quickly.
FDI was preferable because Volkswagen’s competitors were also investing in production facilities in Russia, so they felt that they needed to invest directly to be on the same levels as their rivals.
Answer:
c. brand insistence
Explanation:
Since in the given situation it is mentioned that the 83% of the loyal customers could not find the bonbon products at local stores so they will ordered online instead of purchasing the substitute goods as in the brand insistence refer the stage of the brand loyalty where the purchase would accept no alternatives and they will search for the particular brand only
