Answer:
d. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
The<u> statement "d" best describes the internal coherence of a hypothesis </u>because if the different parts of a hypothesis aren't coherent with each other, aren't related, there's no internal coherence in the first place. All the different parts have to have a rational relationship, have to be rational with each other.
Here's the answers in order:
-
people's rights
- natural law
- social contract
So the full paragraph would read: Many philosophers wrote down their philosophies about the government and <u>people's rights</u>. A number of philosophers published books on the subject. They applied the idea of <u>natural law</u> to social and political analysis. Thomas Hobbes wrote Leviathan, a book about social structure and government. He wrote about the <u>social contract</u>, an agreement in which the people exchanged some of their individual freedoms for the government’s protection.
Answer:
The answer is A) relative motion.
Explanation:
As the name suggests, relative motion refers to the perceived velocity of a point in relation to another.
Some more instances would be the perceived velocity of a car if you're standing the next to the road (the car moves fast), if you're driving a car and moving at the same speed (the other car appears static) or if you're driving the opposite direction (the other car appars to move at double the speed).
It's important to notice that relative motion can be positve or negative.
