9514 1404 393
Explanation:
<u>Statement</u> .... <u>Reason</u>
( ) .... Given (repeat of the given statements)
ΔACB ≅ ΔDCE .... SAS postulate
BA ≅ ED .... corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent
40 degrees can I get crown?
It’s -4 because you need to like distribute then add like terms, etc.
Given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
<h3>What is a Rectangle?</h3>
- A rectangle is a quadrilateral.
- All four angles in a rectangle are right angles.
- The opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel and congruent to each other.
Therefore, based on what we are given and the definition of a rectangle, we can establish that △URS ≅ △STU by SAS.
Since △URS ≅ △STU, therefore ∠USR = ∠SUT by CPCTC.
In conclusion, given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
Learn more about properties of rectangle on:
brainly.com/question/2835318
