Answer:
it might be informative and persuasive I'm pretty sure it is but not 100% I'm sorry
The answer to the first unknown is the "COST SIDE" while the answer to the second unknown in the problem is "PRODUCTION AND MARKETING COST". Hence, with a cost-oriented pricing strategy used and implemented by many companies, a price setter stresses the COST SIDE of the pricing problem and the price is set by looking at the PRODUCTION and MARKETING COST.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
Macroeconomics is the study of the economy as a whole, unlike microeconomics which is the study of the individual firms/markets.
Macroeconomics focuses on the standard of living, unemployment rate, inflation rate etc. and how this affects the whole economy.
Option A is wrong because it is the microeconomics and not macroeconomics that studies the market and the firm.
Option B and D are wrong because these are for microeconomics
Answer:
It seems that someinformation is missing, nevertheless, it is possible to calculate the market value of the firm if you have the total number of shares.
Explanation:
In this case, if the question says that the "outstanding shares" haven't changed, it means that the total number of shares neither, therefore it is possible to get the market value by multiplying $180 (the stock price for 1 share) per the total number of shares
I think you are asking about the productivity comparison of two years
productivity will be more if rate of output is higher
For first year rate of output is 12/4=3 fish per hour
For second year rate of output is 15/6=2.5 fish per hour
So we can see that Jim was more productive in first year as compared to second year
