Answer:
a. differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors
Explanation:
Differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors is an approach that involves replacing a problem behavior with a positive behavior by reinforcing and stimulating a positive behavior that cannot be exhibited the same time with the problem behavior. Differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors works well especially in cases of people having autism spectrum disorder (ASD) where the individual engages in problem behaviors that inflict injury on the individual.
From the question above, the therapist uses the differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors approach, as he uses praise as a reinforcement to increase the frequency at which Zander chews gum or sticks out his tongue, as these behaviors cannot occur together with the behavior of biting of lips. Chewing of gum, sticking out of tongues are reinforced in order to replace the biting of lips with them.
Answer:
Military dictatorship, an authoritarian government controlled by a military and its political designees, called a military junta when done extralegally. Military junta, a government led by a committee of military leaders. Stratocracy, a government traditionally or constitutionally run by a military.
Explanation:
Answer:
Members of congress.
Explanation:
As it is known that framers has placed their work about the said topic that the court has to follow the majority's preference especially in types of societies we find ourselves. In as much as they were smart and visionaries, a lot about the people are been asked to be in consideration in rulings. E.g Privacy is seen to put in here as identity theft is random and also medical histories are private and need not be shared with the general public as it is seen to come to financial records. Therefore congress members are seen to be less oportuned here.
<span>Her fear and emotions to prevent her son from achieving his dreams. She is making an assumption and fortune telling that the same will happen to her son. He will end up resenting her and she may lose her son anyway. She is using logic that is more emotion driven than rational thinking. She is using emotional reasoning.</span>
