Answer:
W = 819152 J = 819.15 KJ
Explanation:
The work done by Juri can be given by the following formula:

where,
W = Work done = ?
F = Force = 200 N
d = distance = 5 km = 5000 m
θ = angle to horizontal = 35°
Therefore,
W = (200 N)(5000 m)Cos 35°
<u>W = 819152 J = 819.15 KJ</u>
Hey!
Formula for calculating work = Force × distance
Work done = Force applied on the object × distance travelled by it.
Hope it helps...!!!
Answer:
The potential energy is transformed into kinetic energy
Explanation:
This particular case is defined as the principle of energy conservation since energy is not created or destroyed only transforms. When you have potential energy it can be transformed into kinetic energy or vice versa. In this problem, we have the case of a ball that sits on a desk and then falls to the ground. In this way the ground will be taken as a reference point, this is a point at which the potential energy will be equal to zero in such a way that when the ball is on the desktop that is above the reference line its potential energy will be maximum. As the ball drops its potential energy decreases, as the height relative to the ground (reference point) decreases. In contrast its kinetic energy increases and increases as it approaches the ground. So when it hits the ground it will have maximum kinetic energy and will be equal to the potential energy for when the ball was on the desk.
Therefore:
![E_{p} = potential energy [J] = E_{k} = kinetic energy [J]where:\\E_{p} =m*g*h\\m =mass [kg]\\g=gravity[m/s^2]\\h=elevation[m]\\E_{k} = \frac{1}{2} *m*v^{2} \\where:\\v=velocity [m/s]\\\frac{1}{2} *m*v^{2} = m*g*h](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E_%7Bp%7D%20%3D%20potential%20energy%20%5BJ%5D%20%3D%20E_%7Bk%7D%20%3D%20kinetic%20energy%20%5BJ%5Dwhere%3A%5C%5CE_%7Bp%7D%20%3Dm%2Ag%2Ah%5C%5Cm%20%3Dmass%20%5Bkg%5D%5C%5Cg%3Dgravity%5Bm%2Fs%5E2%5D%5C%5Ch%3Delevation%5Bm%5D%5C%5CE_%7Bk%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%2Am%2Av%5E%7B2%7D%20%5C%5Cwhere%3A%5C%5Cv%3Dvelocity%20%5Bm%2Fs%5D%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%20%2Am%2Av%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%20m%2Ag%2Ah)
Well first of all, when it comes to orbits of the planets around
the sun, there's no such thing as "orbital paths", in the sense
of definite ("quantized") distances that the planets can occupy
but not in between. That's the case with the electrons in an atom,
but a planet's orbit can be any old distance from the sun at all.
If Mercury, or any planet, were somehow moved to an orbit closer
to the sun, then ...
-- its speed in orbit would be greater,
-- the distance around its orbit would be shorter,
-- its orbital period ("year") would be shorter,
-- the temperature everywhere on its surface would be higher,
-- if it has an atmosphere now, then its atmosphere would become
less dense, and might soon disappear entirely,
-- the intensity of x-rays, charged particles, and other forms of
solar radiation arriving at its surface would be greater.