Wouldn’t the answer be 8 and 3
Answer:
27.4
Step-by-step explanation:
First multiply the numerator and denominator by 10
Then write the problem in long division format
Then divide 52 by 19 and get 2
Then multiply the quotient digit (2) by the divisor 19
Then subtract 38 from 52
Then bring down the next number of the dividend
Then divide 140 by 19 to get 7
Then multiply the quotient digit (7) by the divisor 19
Then subtract 133 from 140
Then add a decimal point to the solution
Then bring down the next number of the dividend
Then divide 76 by 19 to get 4
Then multiply the quotient digit (4) by the divisor 19
Then subtract 76 from 76
The solution for long division for 52.06./1.9 is 27.4
27.4
Answer:
ou
Step-by-step explanation:
op
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
- A
- B
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
1. A decrease of 3.8% is equivalent to a multiplier fraction of -0.038. The only answer choice that has such a multiplier is A.
In an instance such as this, the "rate" is usually some (fractional) change in some period of time. Since the exponent must be unitless, the rate is effectively (some fraction) "per year" so that multiplying by "t" years cancels the units and results in a pure number.
___
<em>Comment on the exponential</em>
If the actual change were -3.8% per year, the exponential term would look like (1 - 0.038)^t = 0.962^t. By writing it as e^(-0.038t), the decrease is effectively compounded continuously. As a result, over a year's time, the decrease is actually about 3.73%, not 3.8%.
_____
2. If ║x/2║ is a magnitude function, answer choices B and D are equivalent. Thus, we must assume it is a "greatest integer" function. Then the number of desserts prepared will be ║x/2║, and the corresponding revenue will be 1.2║x/2║. Since x is in minutes, 2 to 4 hours will be 120–240 minutes. The appropriate choice is B.