Answer:
D) every company is trying to implement them and hence it does not make a company different from others
Explanation:
The problem when something too popular, is that everybody is doing the same thing. This applies to individuals, businesses and even governments.
Total quality, benchmarking and reengineering were seen as complete and radical innovations during the 1980s and 1990s, and back then they really made a difference. The problem is that every company is trying to do the same now, and what makes a company successful is being different and working better than the rest.
Answer:
B)the payback period is on a different time frame.
Explanation:
Return on sustainability investment can be regarded as performance measure that is been utilized in evaluation of the gains which is produced due to result of corporate sustainability initiatives as regards amount of money that is invested in those initiatives.
Sustainable return on investment can be regarded as methodology used in identification as well as quantifying of environmental and societal, impacts of investment as regards a projects and initiatives.
It should be noted that The ROI on sustainability efforts can be difficult to quantify because the payback period is on a different time frame.
Answer:
The economy has an unemployment rate higher than the natural rate of unemployment.
Explanation:
Full Employment is when all workers able & willing to work, are employed.
Unemployment is when a person able & willing to do a work , doesn't get work.
However, there is certain 'natural' level of unemployment normalised during efficient running of economy. It involves frictional & structural unemployment. Frictional unemployment is temporary unemployment of people shifting their jobs and Structural unemployment is temporary unemployment due to industrial reorganisation (eg : technological change).
So, Economy being below Full Employment implies that economy has unemployment level above natural rate of unemployment.
Answer:
correct option is a. $5,935
Explanation:
given data
Direct materials = $3,193
Direct labor hours = 21
Direct labor wage rate = $12
Machine hours = 166
overhead rate = $15
solution
we get Direct labor that is
Direct labor = 21 × $12
Direct labor = 252
and
manufacturing overhead is
manufacturing overhead = 166 × $15
manufacturing overhead = 2490
so here total cost will be
total cost = Direct materials + Direct labor + manufacturing overhead ............1
Total cost = $3,193 + $252 + $2490
Total cost = $5935
so correct option is a. $5,935
Answer: No, because Mallory and Raghav are not bound by the contract.
Explanation: Being bound by a contract entails being linked to a written agreement, the breaching of which could result in consequences lying with the person who breached the contract. However when this contract was entered into, there was a clause that allowed the parties to cancel the contract at any time. When Mallory fired Raghav the contract was subsequently cancelled, making the contract null and void (non - existent). This means that Raghav is not entitled to the outstanding 10 months' salaries.