Answer:
B. I and IV
Explanation:
You can check the SEC website for the bill.
Answer:
Jones may decide that the equity method would not be appropriate to account for the investment when Jones Company does not have significant influences over the management/operation of Sandridge Company.
Although an investors holding from 25% of investee is very much likely to have significant influences on the investee, this may not be true all over the times. For Jones, to prove that it does not have significant influences over Sandridge, there may be some following evidences:
+ Jones and Sandridge sign an agreement that Jones surrenders significant rights as a shareholder;
+ There is/are investor(s)/group(s) of investors who has more voting right than Jones and whose visionary/mission for Sandridge is opposite to Jones's.
+ Sandridge tries to reject Jones' influences on its management by seeking lawsuit or by successfully prevent representatives from Jones on its Board of Directors.
Explanation:
Answer:
Unilateral contract
Explanation:
According to the given statement in the question, this is a type of a unilateral contract.
The unilateral contract is a type of contract in which only a single party makes the promises or undertakes the tasks or the responsibilities in return to the task or an act performed by the second party.
Here,
The car dealer is promising the salesperson to give bonus upon the selling of 10 cars by the salesperson.
Answer:
$1,000; $1,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Household saving = $300
Business saving = $700
Government purchases = $1,000
Government transfers and interest payments = $500
Government tax collections = $1,500
GDP = $5,000
Public saving:
= Government tax collections - Government purchases - Government transfers and interest payments
= $1,500 - $1,000 - $500
= $0
Private savings:
= Household saving + Business saving
= $300 + $700
= $1,000
National savings:
= Public saving + Private saving
= $0 + $1,000
= $1,000
