Answer:
C) Which argument for restricting free trade is politically feasible?
Explanation:
Foreign trade and globalization are here and there is nothing any country can do to stop it. As a country, you either engage in foreign trade or face with the possibility of becoming the next North Korea.
We can argue the benefits of foreign trade or how can we increase them, but the fact that foreign trade exists and cannot be stopped is something that not even President Trump could avoid.
Answer: A. Stability and change
Explanation:
The innovation paradox implies that consistency in products and services provokes a tension with the need for new products. This results in a conflict between
A) stability and change.
B) structure and culture.
C) rewards and metrics.
D) stability and metrics
The paralysis that occurs between sticking to existing products and services (stability) and the need for the development of new ones (change) is a direct effect of the innovation paradox which states that the more a firm pays attention to innovation, the less likely it will be to be successful at innovation. In other words, consistency in products and services provokes a tension with the need for new products. While stability enables change in that it supplies security and consistency, reserved knowledge and skills and enables commitment and the provision of resources for a better realization and actualization of change, change enables a firm to set up a new state of stability through variable mechanisms (innovation) This serves to assist an organization in reaching new stable stages with higher efficiency.
<span>The market structure for which economists have the least precise model of price determination is oligopoly.
</span><span><span>Oligopoly is a market structure in which a small number of firms has the large majority of market share.</span></span>
