Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Susan:
Annual deposit= $5,000 for 10 years
Lumo-sum for 30 years
Interest rate= 8.5%
Jane:
Annual deposit= $5,000 for 30 years.
<u>First, we will calculate the future value of Susan:</u>
<u></u>
First 10 years:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {5,000*[(1.085^10)-1]}/0.085
FV= $74,175.50
Last 30 years:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 74,175.50*(1.085^30)
FV= $857,050.14
<u>Jane:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {5,000*[(1.085^30)-1]}/0.085
FV= $621,073.63
<u>Earnings difference= 857,050.14 - 621,073.63= $235,976.51 in favor of Susan.</u>
Answer: Noting down of ideas
Explanation: Cedric could note down the ideas and points he remembers on the back of his test booklet. He should first read the question and make short notes of every point he remembers regarding that question.
This strategy will help Cedric to answer the questions while doing the final writing in answer sheet. By doing this he can also improve his speed with accuracy while answering.
Answer:
The options for this question are the following:
a. vestibule training
b. management development programs
c. performance appraisals
d. orientation programs
The correct answer is c. performance appraisals
.
Explanation:
Performance appraisal is a structural and systematic procedure to measure, evaluate and influence attributes (eg cooperation in teamwork and loyalty), behaviors (eg level of assistance and treatment given to clients) and work-related results (eg quantity and quality of the fruits of work), in order to discover to what extent the employee is productive and whether he will be able to improve his future performance. The performance evaluation process plays a monitoring role in order to:
- To provide management with information to make decisions regarding the future development of the employee, by identifying and preparing, through training and improvement programs, the most suitable candidates so that they can assume a greater number of responsibilities.
- Establish the relative value of a subject's contribution to the company and evaluate individual achievements.
- Provide general data on the expected performance of employees.
- Structure the dialogue between superior and subordinate, forcing superiors to improve knowledge of the subordinate's job.
- Be the basis to distribute the remuneration, rewards, bonuses and determine the levels \ salary increases.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
They were struggling with money so they couldn't spend very much.
Answer:
Certainly, they cannot prevail. The contract terms stated clearly that "time is of the essence of this contract." The Bassos and Miceli and Slonim Development Corp did not actually respect this contract term.
The contract was expected to have closed at 10:00 am on May 16, 1988, and not after. By the time that Dierberg left the venue, the contract should have been finalized. Alternatively, if there were unseen delays, Dierberg should have been informed at least 30 minutes before 10:00 am.
Explanation:
The argument by Miceli and Slonim does not hold water. The contract did require closing exactly at 10:00 AM, and not some time on May 16. In my considered opinion, suing Dierberg is a waste of court time and process.
