1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
o-na [289]
3 years ago
14

What is a social group? How are in-groups different from out-groups?

Social Studies
2 answers:
liubo4ka [24]3 years ago
7 0

Hello.

What is a socail Group? : A Social group can be defined as two or more people who interact with one another and share similar characteristics.


How are in-groups different from out-groups: An outgroup is any group that you don't belong to, while an ingroup is a group that you associate yourself with.

Have a nice day

MakcuM [25]3 years ago
3 0

A social group is a set of people with similarities and possess some common identity; the social group is important to help improve the social interaction between people. In-groups and out-groups are different in several aspects.

EXPLANATION:  

Here are some differences between in-group and out-group:

1. In-group is a group where someone or an individual can identify himself. The examples are in-group family and in-group college. On the other hand, the out-group is the group where someone or an individual cannot identify himself.  

2. The in-group uses the term “we” to refer to its members or participants. The out-group uses the term “they” for those who are out of the group.  

3. Someone belongs to his in-group but he doesn’t belong to his out-group.  

4. The in-group is based on ethnocentrism where out-group is not.  

5. In-group is about similarities among its members: attitude, goal, behavior, point of view, and opinion. Yet, the out-group is about differences among people’s attitudes, goals, behavior, point of view, and opinion.  

6. In-group members have a positive attitude toward other members who belong to the same group. Yet, they have a negative attitude toward out-groups members. In-group members support each other where they rarely or never support those who belong to the out-group.  

7. In-group builds co-operation, mutual help, good-will, and possess a sense of solidarity among its members. Yet, the out-group shows dislike, avoidance, antagonism, and indifference.  

8. In-group is where someone belongs to a certain group, where out-groups are where he doesn’t belong to it.

LEARN MORE:  

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

1. What is a social group? Why are social groups important in society? What are two groups that you are a part of? brainly.com/question/2806237

KEYWORDS:  social group, in-groups, out-groups, how are in-groups different from out-groups, the differences between in-groups and out-groups  

Subject: Social studies

Class:  7-9

Sub-chapter: Social group    

You might be interested in
How does UNFPA run its activities?​
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer: work from policymaker

gender based violence

justice system

humanitarian partner    

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
According to erikson, during the later years of life of an adult, evaluating his or her life is characteristic of the _____ stag
Eva8 [605]

the answer is, "integrity versus despair." hope this helped!

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do states have different governments? Does government bind states together? If so, how?
sleet_krkn [62]
The government works the same for every state. Some states implement different laws for their borders but the basic principles are the same throughout the United States.
7 0
3 years ago
The ability strength and capacity to do something​
PolarNik [594]

Strength, power, force, might suggest capacity to do something. Strength is inherent capacity to manifest energy, to endure, and to resist. ... Force is the exercise of power: One has the power to do something

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Arembepe, Brazil, a degree of community solidarity was promoted by the myth that everyone was kin. However, social solidarity
lawyer [7]

Answer:

Intense social solidarity demands that some people be excluded. By asserting they were all related—that is, by excluding no one—Arembepeiros were actually weakening kinship's potential strength in creating and maintaining group solidarity.

Explanation:

Social solidarity is a sociological term, that is based on shared values and beliefs, which describes the interdependence relationship between individuals in a society, such that, individuals get to assume that they can improve the lives of other members in the group or society.

However, intense social solidarity demands that some people be excluded such that, the numbers of the members will not be too large to form the connections between them and will make the members to have the feeling of being among.

Hence, by asserting they were all related—that is, by excluding no one—Arembepeiros were actually weakening kinship's potential strength in creating and maintaining group solidarity.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Israel is a secular state. what does this mean
    9·1 answer
  • Which was a motivation behind the issuing of the Monroe Doctrine
    9·2 answers
  • One contribution that john locke made to enlightenment philosophy was the idea that absolute monarchies should continue the puni
    10·1 answer
  • Which event ultimately brought about the decline of Mississippian civilizations?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following would probably be the MOST reliable source of information about an event that happened 60 years ago?
    6·1 answer
  • The ______perspective believes that certain behavior patterns have a hereditary basis .​
    8·1 answer
  • A free enterprise system is a type of economy that:
    12·1 answer
  • What does the word allies mean in the phrase “with few Algonquian allies in the area to trade with”?
    10·1 answer
  • In his, farewell adress of 1796,president george washington warned against
    12·2 answers
  • Constructive discharge is a theory that plaintiffs can use to establish any type of discrimination claim under Title VII and oth
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!