The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
Answer:
Gorbachev's decision to loosen the Soviet yoke on the countries of Eastern Europe created an independent, democratic momentum that led to the collapse of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, and then the overthrow of Communist rule throughout Eastern Europe.
Explanation:
Hope this help> Please mark me brainlest ❤️
- Have a wonderful day
Answer:Rich DeVos and Hay Van Andel
Explanation: Ja-Ri was incorporated in 1959 and changed its name
Answer:
They moved south to find Rome and then spread around a place now known as Italy
Explanation:
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>It was Taken over by women. They also had to start producing war materials instead of consumer goods</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
- <em>During World War II, more specifically after the attack on Pearl Harbor, American industrial production intensified, as a result of the increase in arms production and civilian supplies destined for combat forces.
</em>
- <em>More labor was needed for this, which in turn was scarce since many men were on the battlefront. Therefore, many industrial positions were occupied by women.</em>
- <em>During the war, a peak of production was reached, which helped the United States to leave behind the Great Depressio</em>n.
