The curve

is parameterized by

so in the line integral, we have





You are mistaken in thinking that the gradient theorem applies here. Recall that for a scalar function

, we have gradient

. The theorem itself then says that the line integral of

along a curve

parameterized by

, where

, is given by

Specifically, in order for this theorem to even be considered in the first place, we would need to be integrating with respect to a vector field.
But this isn't the case: we're integrating

, a scalar function.
Answer:
20 x 4 = 60
Step-by-step explanation:
because it's says how many
Answer:
multiply
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
V = 125.6 in³
Step-by-step explanation:
let V be volume, h the height and r the radius, then the equation relating the quantities is
V = khr² ← k is the constant of variation
To find k use the condition V = 402.12, h = 8, r = 4
402.12 = k × 8 × 4² = 128k ( divide both sides by 128 )
3.14 = k [ note 3.14 is π )
V = 3.14hr² ← equation of variation [ V = πr²h ]
Given r = 2 and h = 10, then
V = 3.14 × 10 × 2² = 3.14 × 40 = 125.6
I’m not sure,where is that from?