Answer:
The answer is explained below.
Explanation:
Scientific method is the one that studies phenomena through some steps that have been tested before; it also follows the same procedures every time (as long as it is possible; even the environment should be put in the same conditions) and, if done with enough attention and good care, it can lead to reliable results.
Due to these characteristics (reliability and procedures) it is a good way to study phenomena; since it is necessary to be aware of every little detail, it can help us understand things in general and in a deeper way.
People who study communication may find this method very helpful; I also think that computer science could be a good field to be studied with the scientific method.
I believe the answer is: . Skinnerian
The skinnerian perspective view that reward and punishment play a big role in shaping people's overall behaviour.
People tend to develop the behaviour which based on their experience benefit them in a certain way and vice versa. One thing that the parents can do to handle the problem is by countering the negative behaviour by giving better rewards for the daughter for abandoning the target behaviour.
Answer:
narcissistic
Explanation:
Narcissistic personality disorder: In abnormal psychology, the term "narcissistic personality disorder" is described as one of the different types of personality disorders in which an individual is dealing with a mental condition whereby he or she experiences an inflated sense of one's own significance, troubled relationships, an intense need for excessive admiration & attention, and absence of empathy for someone else.
In the question above, the given statement represents narcissistic personality disorder.
Tort reform is a big part of health care reform because "It works to cut legal costs and keep medical issues out of the courts".
In general, after finding factually noteworthy confirmation we see that therapeutic tort reform is related with a lessening in health care services costs. In testing the impact of one, two, and three changes, we locate a critical negative connection between tort change and social insurance costs in states where two restorative tort changes were passed. In particular, we find that the section of two therapeutic tort changes altogether diminished both aggregate premiums and manager commitments to premiums. The outcomes were to a great extent irrelevant for states that passed one and three changes.
Answer:
Very tough exams and assignments
