Answer:
Cashflow from Operating Activities $
Net income 61,000
Add: items not involving movement of cash
Depreciation <u>76,000</u>
137,000
Changes in working capital:
Increase in prepaid rent (56,000)
Increase in accounts payable <u>11,000</u>
92,000
Less: Tax <u> 16,000</u>
Cashflow from operating activities <u> 76,000</u>
Explanation:
Cashflow from operaing activities using the indirect method equals net income plus depreciation minus increase in prepaid rent plus increase in accounts payable minus tax.
Answer:
15 ounces.
Explanation:
The first ounce is worth 0.40, and the additional x ounces are worth 0.25 each. So, the inequality should be Y > A + B * X, where Y is equal to 4, A is the value of the first ounce (0.4), B is the value of the additional ounces (0.25) and x is the quantity of additional ounces.
- 4 > 0.4 + x * 0.25
- 4 - 0.4 > 0.25x
- 3.6/0.25 > x
- 14,4 > x
14 is the maximum of additional ounces that can be mailed, we have to add the first one, for a total of 15 whole ounces that can be mailed for no more than $4.
Since he is planning on an annual inflation rate of 2%., the statement that explains the interest rates relating to the CD is nominal interest rate is 3% while the real interest rate is 1%.
A real interest rate refers to the nominal rate which is adjusted for inflation.
- We are given that Interest (nominal rate) is 3% and planned Inflation rate = 2%
- Real interest rate = 1% (Nominal rate - inflation rate)
Hence, the statement that explains the interest rates relating to the CD is nominal interest rate is 3% while the real interest rate is 1%.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about Real interest rate
<em>brainly.com/question/25816355</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is a. an illegal search under 4th amendment protections.
Explanation:
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects two fundamental rights: the right to privacy and the right not to suffer an arbitrary invasion.
The investigation is the procedure in which a government official or agent violates a reasonable expectation of privacy. When it interferes with the right of property of a person we face a case of confiscation. The owner must have a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding the seized objects. A person is considered to have been apprehended when law enforcement personnel use physical force to retain them in such a way that, in a similar situation, any reasonable person would feel deprived of their liberty.
<span>more
increasing
i am not super sure</span>