Answer:
D, product-communication adaptation
Explanation:
Product adaptation can be defined as the process of modifying a product to make it useful for a variety of users.
Communication adaptation can also be defined as the change in a product's communication as a result of a change in product strategy.
Product-communication adaptation can be defined as the modification of a product for a variety of users but ensuring that the marketing of the product is through standard communication channels.
In the case of Campbell adapted his product to look like M'm M'm Good product but ensured that he used a standard communication channel (ads) to market his product.
Cheers.
Answer:
B. Cash 1,300 Dr, Accounts Receivable 1,200 Dr, Consulting Revenue 2,500 Cr
Explanation:
Kincaid Company
Journal Entry
Date Description Debit Credit
Cash $1,300
<em>Accounts Receivable $1,200</em>
Consulting Revenue $2,500
Answer
This new position as a first line manager will require him to operate his departments. This role requires him to assign tasks, manage the work flow, monitor the quality of work, solve the employees problems and keep informing the middle and executive managers on challenges and success on the ground level of the company.
Explanations
First-line managers provide firsthand information on true challenges and can offer better and workable solutions. This is because they have the immediate view of the outcomes of the policies, strategies, marketing approaches and production capabilities of the company. They have the ear of upper managers, where they will offer solutions that can improve the processes in the company and the procedures. In addition to that, first-line managers are expected by the work-group employees to protect them from policies and initiatives which are unreasonable.
Answer: 1) organizes assets and liabilities into important subgroups 2) is more useful to decision makers 3) lists current assets in order of how quickly they can be converted to cash
Explanation: see image
Answer:
<h2>Considering absence of collusion,the firms will choose low price in this instance.</h2>
Explanation:
- First,focusing on all the possible payoffs for the firms under low price situation, the possible individual payoffs for the firms are $8 million and $16 million considering that the other firm chooses low price and high price respectively.
- Now, regarding the individual payoffs from choosing high price, the possible payoffs for the firms are $12 million and $4 million, considering that the other firm chooses high price and low price respectively.
- Therefore, notice that considering all possible scenarios,both the minimum and maximum payoffs from choosing low price are actually higher than the same estimates under choosing higher price.
- Hence, to ensure a higher subsequent individual payoff, both the firms would expectedly choose lower price considering the possibilities of both higher minimum and maximum payoff compared to choosing higher price.
