1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yawa3891 [41]
3 years ago
11

Which provision of the USA patriot act of 2001 was later held to be unconstitutional

History
1 answer:
VikaD [51]3 years ago
3 0

The Patriot Act of 2001 is unconstitutional due to Section 215. This violates the Fouth Ammendment.

The Fourth Amendment says that the government cannot perform searches without first getting a warrant with probable cause. The Patriot Act allowed for the CIA, FBI, and NSA to search <em>without</em> a warrant, thus making Section 215 unconstitutional.

Please, please, please let me know if you have any more questions!

You might be interested in
Please please please please answer i have exam tomorrow ​
babunello [35]

Answer:

1.Prithvi Narayan Shah

2. Bhuktaman

3. Elam also known as Yalambar

4. Mahashivagupta(alias Janamejaya)

5. Bhaskerverma

6. Manadeva I

7. Arimalla or Ari Dev

8. Jaya Prakash Malla of Kathmandu, Tej Narsingh Malla of Lalitpur and Ranajit Malla of Bhaktapur

9. Jaya Prakash Malla

10. Not sure but i think it is Jayaparakash Malla

11. Jung Bahadur Rana

12. Bhuvan Singh

13. Amshuvarma

14. Jang Bahadur

15. Bishweshwar Prasad Koirala

16. Pushpa Kamal Dahal

17. Louis XVI

18. Gyanendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev

19. George Washington

20. Sir Rabindranath Tagore

4 0
3 years ago
How did the beating of senator sumner pull the nation apart
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer: On May 22, 1856, the "world's greatest deliberative body" became a combat zone. In one of the most dramatic and deeply ominous moments in the Senate's entire history, a member of the House of Representatives entered the Senate Chamber and savagely beat a senator into unconsciousness. The inspiration for this clash came three days earlier when Senator Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts antislavery Republican, addressed the Senate on the explosive issue of whether Kansas should be admitted to the Union as a slave state or a free state. In his "Crime Against Kansas" speech, Sumner identified two Democratic senators as the principal culprits in this crime—Stephen Douglas of Illinois and Andrew Butler of South Carolina. He characterized Douglas to his face as a "noise-some, squat, and nameless animal . . . not a proper model for an American senator."  Andrew Butler, who was not present, received more elaborate treatment. Mocking the South Carolina senator's stance as a man of chivalry, the Massachusetts senator charged him with taking "a mistress . . . who, though ugly to others, is always lovely to him; though polluted in the sight of the world, is chaste in his sight—I mean," added Sumner, "the harlot, Slavery." Representative Preston Brooks was Butler's South Carolina kinsman. If he had believed Sumner to be a gentleman, he might have challenged him to a duel. Instead, he chose a light cane of the type used to discipline unruly dogs. Shortly after the Senate had adjourned for the day, Brooks entered the old chamber, where he found Sumner busily attaching his postal frank to copies of his "Crime Against Kansas" speech. Moving quickly, Brooks slammed his metal-topped cane onto the unsuspecting Sumner's head. As Brooks struck again and again, Sumner rose and lurched blindly about the chamber, futilely attempting to protect himself. After a very long minute, it ended. Bleeding profusely, Sumner was carried away.  Brooks walked calmly out of the chamber without being detained by the stunned onlookers. Overnight, both men became heroes in their respective regions. Surviving a House censure resolution, Brooks resigned, was immediately reelected, and soon thereafter died at age 37. Sumner recovered slowly and returned to the Senate, where he remained for another 18 years. The nation, suffering from the breakdown of reasoned discourse that this event symbolized, tumbled onward toward the catastrophe of civil war.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
During World War II, why were Tehran and Yalta significant?
Ainat [17]
They were places where meeting of the big three allies were held
4 0
4 years ago
Rationalists (like Descartes) and empiricists (like Locke and Berkeley) differ on their epistemology approach because:
ziro4ka [17]
Many things is possible but mos likely D
8 0
3 years ago
France and Spain supported the colonists during the American Revolution by
defon
 ¨providing naval assistance¨<span>Hope this helps</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • During the 1600s, the Quakers of the middle colonies believed that
    10·2 answers
  • What sort of federalism saw the federal government give power back to the states?
    12·1 answer
  • What was a provision of Magna Carta?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the native American that went to England with James Edward Oglethorpe?
    7·1 answer
  • Why are unions not as prevalent in western states?
    15·1 answer
  • How did napolean become a dictator<br> (35 points answer quick)
    7·2 answers
  • Shay's rebellion contributed to the belief among political leaders that
    15·2 answers
  • The railroad changed the economy in all the following ways except:
    7·1 answer
  • How has islam changed over time
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME QUICK!!!!
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!