This is a very philosophical question, so it requires your own opinions and reasoning. I will help as much as I can for you to develop your thoughts, but I cannot write them for you.
One of the most important things for you to reference in question two is the natural state of man. How was it like? Are we peaceful and individualistic, as John Locke states in <em>Two Treatise of Government</em>, or are humans selfish and natural life would be "nasty, brutish, and short" as Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes state in <em>The Prince </em>and <em>The Leviathan </em>(respective titles)? Why is this so?
These philosophers also give a reason as to why government is necessary for humankind. For Locke, it is to protect the people from larger threats. For Hobbes, it is to make man civilized. For Machiavelli, it is for a leader to align their self-interest with those of the people and make a prosperous community.
If you need any more help, ask me! I hope this helps :)
The long form is: United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon
Answer:
It is B
Explanation:
The participant has never taken an intelligence test before.
Answer:
c. liability of foreignness; regionalization
Explanation:
Liability of foreignness is the term that companies gets in to foreign countries market so this is kind of responsibility for company that searching for out source. For instance, some companies are not just exist in their local market but also other countries markets which leads globalization. However, there might need for some integrations with geographic, cultural, economic and administrative factors. These factors analyzed before entering foreign market.
Regionalization is a kind of adaptation that companies sets their resources according to market. If company seeks to enter foreign markets then resource share might not stable thanks to differences in different market regions. Well, companies using different amount of resources region to region with special implementation to each market.
Thus, liability of foreignness and regionalization are environmental trends that taken consideration by firm's for international corporate-level strategies.
Alright here’s what I suggest you do when writing (really all essays) this essay. Works well for me,especially when I don’t like the topic.
-Game plan-
Intro: The introduction is easy, just get the key elements in such as a hook at the beginning (something interesting about your subject to get the reader invested) and a thesis at the end (run down of what your going to talk about in the next 3 paragraphs)
Paragraph 1: talk about the effects of a presidential system. What this means, how it works, pros and cons. Use at least 1 piece of evidence from a source and then talk about it. (Evidence is really good if you need to fluff up your essay a little)
Paragraph 2: talk about parliamentary system. Answer all of the questions in the previous paragraph. Pros and cons. Again, one piece of evidence. Don’t be afraid to fluff it up a little.
Paragraph 3: compare the two. Which in YOUR OPINION is better. Go into detail with which you would choose. Pick your best piece of evidence about the system you chose to back you up. Be VERY FLUFFY with your word choice.
Conclusion: super easy, just summarize your introduction but add more detail about your opinion. Sum it up with something witty you found in your research. Make yourself sound like the smartest person in the world.
Hope this helps!
