1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masya89 [10]
4 years ago
5

The radius of earth is earth 6378.1 km, which is 2981.1 km greater than the radius of Mars. Find the radius of Mars.

Mathematics
2 answers:
DIA [1.3K]4 years ago
6 0
The radius of Mars is equal to 6378.1 - 2981.1, which is 3,397 km
kap26 [50]4 years ago
4 0
So, the radius of Mars is less than the radius of Earth, so...
6378.1-2981.1= 3397
The radius of Mars is 3397 km
You might be interested in
The density of an object is the quotient of its mass and its volume
Anika [276]
That's a safe position to take, and a statement unexcelled for accuracy or veracity. Do you have a question to ask ?
4 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know the answer???
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

-2

Step-by-step explanation:

41 - 8m - 57 = 0

41- 8m = 57

-8m = 57-41

-8m = 16

m = -16/8

m = -2

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
in 2005-2006 the average attendance at a premiership football match was 34000 to the nearest 1000 what was the smallest possible
Vesnalui [34]
33500 as that is the lowest that rounds up
4 0
3 years ago
Find the missing numbers is 7 and 9 and 10 right if not what are the answers for 7 and 9 and 8 and 10 please help me ?
Black_prince [1.1K]
#8 is 10, all other answers are correct

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many planets are there
    11·2 answers
  • 20 POINTS!!!!WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST HELP ME!!!!!!!!PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Log19–3x = log19(x + 5)
    7·1 answer
  • A store wants employees to start wearing uniforms to work. The plans to purchase the uniforms and hand out 5 uniforms to every e
    5·1 answer
  • What the the opposite of - 4.1 ?
    10·2 answers
  • Can you solve this? (x−1)2+(y−2)2=4
    10·1 answer
  • Please helpppp I will give brainliest
    14·1 answer
  • HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS MATH PROBLEM!!!
    13·2 answers
  • A school store buys pencils in bulk and sells them to students for a small profit. The school pays $2.00 for 100 pencils and sel
    11·2 answers
  • My son wants to make and equilateral triangle with sticks and string. Explain how he could do this?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!