Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the C) whether or not student-athletes are students who participate in sports, or athletes who may also go to class.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that Christopher Saffici and Robert Pellegrino wrote their article in 2012 with the title "Intercollegiate athletics vs. academics: the student-athlete or the athlete-student." Their main argument is that the students who are accepted in colleges due to their athletic skills often are not prepared to do well academically while meeting the expectations and demands as athletes, so, in turn, they are given preferential treatment in school, and they are overworked, becoming more athletes that go to college (without truly succeeding academically, as they are supposed to), that students who are also athletes.
In fact, they say that "It is not a question of whether or not the experience for a student-athlete is different from that of a traditional student. Instead, the issue at hand here is whether or not student-athletes are students that participate in extracurricular competitive sports, or have become athletes that also go to classes whenever their athletic schedules allow."
ok, what is the question?
Objectivity when studying sociology and society in general can have the following drawbacks:
1. Objectivity does not guarantee valid findings- When researching a social phenomenon, if a researcher is objective in his approach, operating on fixed-answer questions and predetermined research questions, he will likely miss out on in-depth and comprehensive answers or explanations to his questions.
2. Objectivity is not possible for all social phenomena since some phenomena or social processes are simply not quantifiable.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The courts have played an important role in adjudicating racial categorization processes. Understanding court decisions around racial categorization processes further underscores how race and ethnicity are </em><u><em>Social and historical constructs.</em></u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Social construct can be defined as the process of giving the idea about something to an individual by the society. Race is an example of social construct. Race is <em>categorized in different ways </em>based on outlook like skin color, size of eye, accent, and physical features.
The study of <em>history of different races and study</em> of the reasons behind the behavioral approach of certain tribe might be an historical construct. Historical construct may be used to increase the <em>satisfaction to the people of certain race. </em>
