Answer:
I think the first one cause it kinda makes more sense
According to Pierre Bourdieu, the use of culture to display and mantain social position is an example of <u>habitus.</u>
The habitus is one of the central concepts of Bordieu's sociological work. It consists of different ways of acting, thinking and feeling related to social position, and makes people who belong to the same homogeneous environment share similar lifestyles.
By cultivating tastes for fine foods, wines and art, as well as vacationing in expensive and remote locations, members of elite social classes construct their own habitus, dominating lower social classes.
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
A drought decreases the supply of agricultural products, which means that at any given price, a lower amount will be supplied. Conversely, particularly apt weather would shift the supply curve to the right.
