Answer:
Muir describes his traitorous journey he had to embark through the swamp and narrate how the trip was dangerous and uneasy. He uses words such as difficult, struggling, fear, extensive, crooked, brood heaps, faint, hungry and tangled to depicts the severity of the event. Muir uses diction with a negative connotation to elicit the fear and concern that he felt when he became worried whether or not he'd be able to make it out of the swamp before night.
Answer:
1. Fighting terrorism will bring the peace and harmony around the world, people will get together both emotionally and economically. In such a case, America will be able to expand their economy beyond the current extent.
2. By advancing democracy and human rights people of the country will be able to raise their voice against any injustice and true form of democracy will prevail. It will enhance the society overall.
3. Shaping the global economy can only be done by a country like America which have both intelligence and man power. It will make America, the leader of the world.
Answer:
The response of the interviewer to each candidate
Explanation:
The interviewer is the dependent variable in Gina experiment on discrimination based on looks in hiring. Gina key aspect of her experiment is to give the dependent variable level of Independence in operating.
The outcome of Gina's study will be determine on whether the interviewer will employ the candidate with extremely attractiveness even when he knew both candidate posses equivalent qualifications or not
Emily has a mild intellectual disability. This means that her IQ is below 69 but above 55. People who have a mild intellectual disability are usually able to live independently and hold a job. They may need help from a caregiver (parent, sibling) but are able to perform most activities independently.
Answer:
- Effective, but not efficient.
Explanation:
Leadership is associated with a blend of effective as well efficient performance to attain the quality goals within a specified time-limit.
As per the given description, Brenda would be called an <u>'effective, but not efficient'</u> manager as she, however, produced the desired quality results effectively but could not ensure the 'maximum utilization of time'(as she took more time as compared to the other managers). This wastage or not using time efficiently demonstrates that she was effective but not efficient as she failed to employ the resources in the supreme possible manner.
