Information: When it comes down to picking federal judges, you wouldn't want to pick someone you barely know or trust. Would you choose from a place with people you know or place with people you don't know?
Answer: They'd probably choose from their own political party since they are familiar with the people there and know if they are capable or not.
Answer:
1 Italy. Italy wasn't a nation-state at the time but the Italian Peninsula was home to Rome and the church-owned Papal States. ...
2 Ireland. Ireland also wasn't an independent state at the time, but it remained a strong Catholic area in a churning Protestant sea. ...
3 Spain and Portugal. ...
4 France.
Explanation:
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
The final unification occurred in a way that created the most conflict in France because of the proclamations.
<h3>What was the final unification of Germany?</h3>
The unification happened in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian War and this lead to the German princes proclaiming the German nation in Versailles, France.
Hence, this unification occurred in a way that created the most conflict in France because of the proclamations.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about final unification
<em>brainly.com/question/1168238</em>
#SPJ1
The Marbury v<span>. </span>Madison<span> of 1803 was </span>important<span> because it was the first </span>Supreme Court case<span> to apply the principle of judicial review, the power of federal </span>courts<span> to void acts of Congress that were in conflict with the Constitution.</span>
