1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shtirl [24]
3 years ago
9

Julia is allowed to watch no more than 5 hours of television a week. So far this week, she has watched 1.5 hours. Write and solv

e an inequality to show how many hours of television Julia can still watch this week.
Mathematics
1 answer:
mojhsa [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The inequality to show how many hours of television Julia can still watch this week can be given as:

⇒ x+1.5\leq 5

where x represents he number of hours of television that Julia can still watch this week

On solving for x, we get

x\leq3.5

Thus, Julia can still watch no more than 3.5 hours of television this week.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Julia is allowed to watch television no more than 5 hours a week.

She has already watched 1.5 hours

To write and solve an inequality to show how many hours of television Julia can still watch this week.

Solution:

Let the number of hours of television that Julia can still watch this week be = x

Number of hours already watched = 1.5

Total number of hours of watching television this week would be given as:

⇒ x+1.5

It is given that Julia is allowed to watch no more than 5 hours of television in a week.

Thus, the inequality can be given as:

⇒ x+1.5\leq 5

Solving for x

Subtracting both sides by 1.5

x+1.5-1.5\leq 5-1.5

x\leq3.5

Thus, Julia can still watch no more than 3.5 hours of television this week.

You might be interested in
If two lines are perpendicular, which statement must be true? A) The product of their slopes is 1. B) Their slopes are opposites
castortr0y [4]
If two lines are perpendicular, the statement that must be true is : D. The product of their slopes is -1

Lets say that a line has a slope of 2, the line which perpendicular to that line would have a slope of -1/2

Which means, the product would be 2(-1/2) = -1

hope this helps
4 0
2 years ago
Jasmine purchased a laptop worth $1,500 in 2007. It loses its value by %32 each year. What is the value of the laptop in 2010? R
Lunna [17]

Answer:

$471.65

Step-by-step explanation:

-The value of the laptop after each year is calculated by the formula:

P_t=P_o(1-d)^t

where:

P_t is the value at time t

P_o is the initial value

d is the rate of depreciation

t is the time

#We substitute the values to solve for the value after 3 years(2010-2007=3):

P_t=P_o(1-d)^t\\\\=1500(1-0.32)^3\\\\=\$471.65

Hence, the value of the laptop in 2010 is $471.65

3 0
3 years ago
Any one can help me please please I need help please each one 3 step explanation
Art [367]

Answer:

a) Area of wall to be painted = 114 sq ft

b) Number of cans required = 2×5 = 10

c) Total cost of paint = $338.43

Step-by-step explanation:

<h2>Part a)</h2>

We are asked to find the area of wall that needs to be painted.

we need to subtract the area of window from the area of wall.

We know that area of a rectangular shape is given by

Area = Width×Length

Area of whole wall = 8×15 = 120 sq ft

Area of window = 2×3 = 6 sq ft

Area of wall to be painted = 120 - 6 = 114 sq ft

<h2>Part b)</h2>

1 can of paint will cover 25 sq ft of area.

So to cover the area of wall to be painted,

114/25 = 4.56

since number of cans cannot be in fraction so we would need 5 cans

Since two coats of paints are needed so

Number of cans required = 2×5 = 10

<h2>Part c)</h2>

1 can of paint costs $29.95

We have total 10 cans

$29.95×10 = $299.5

There is also a 13% tax so the total cost is

$299.5×0.13 = $38.93

Total cost of paint = $299.5 + $38.93

Total cost of paint = $338.43

3 0
3 years ago
Neep help pls, what is the answer????
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

No, According to triangle Inequality theorem.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Length given are 4 in., 5 in., 1 in.

We need to check whether with these lengths we can create triangular components.

The Triangle Inequality Theorem states that the sum of any 2 sides of a triangle must be greater than the measure of the third side.

These must be valid for all three sides.

Hence we will check for all three side,

4 in + 5 in > 1 in. (It is a Valid Condition)

1 in + 5 in > 4 in. (It is a Valid Condition)

4 in + 1 in > 5 in. (It is not a Valid Condition)

Since 2 condition are valid and 1 condition is not we can say;

A triangular component cannot be created with length 4 in, 5 in, and 1 in by using triangle inequality theorem (since all three conditions must be valid).

6 0
3 years ago
Joyce paid $230 for an item at the store that was 20% off the original price. What was the original price?
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

250

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help me i beg of u plzz
    5·1 answer
  • Use Quotient rule and simplify
    13·1 answer
  • Write an expression for the number of feet in x inches.
    11·2 answers
  • David had been pricing bus fares for a group trip to New York. Three adults and four children must pay $159. Two adults and thre
    13·1 answer
  • Guys I need help ASAP please!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the best answer??
    13·1 answer
  • Find the slope for (4,5) and (4,-2)
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a like term for 3x^2y<br> 4xy<br> 8xy^2<br> 5x^2y
    10·1 answer
  • The scale of a map is 4 cm: 15 km. If the distance on the map between two cities is 7 cm, what is the actual distance?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help i will mark you brainiest
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!