Answer:Trying to resolve a problem without being controlling
Explanation:
His dad is using a control strategy as a form of resolving his son's laziness which has no positive influence if one is trying to discipline someone or show them a right path.
A supportive climate should create a positive atmosphere where someone doesn't feel that they are under control of another person but they should be able to see where they went wrong whilst they can also feel supported.
When using the justification that "the tactic was unavoidable," The negotiator is saying that the negotiator was not in full control of his or her actions and hence should not be held responsible.
The more battles he won, the more likely he would become president
Mason's experiencing Persecutory delusions as Mason had the impression that people were talking about him and that his neighbors were conspiring against him in order to evict him from his home.
<h3>What is Persecutory delusions?</h3>
When someone has persecutory delusions, they believe others are trying to harm them despite evidence to the contrary.
It's a form of paranoid thinking that can accompany a variety of mental conditions.
Thus, Persecutory delusions is the brain disorder faced by Mason.
For further information about the persecutory delusions, click here:
brainly.com/question/15371553
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that necessitates courts to follow historical cases when creating a ruling on a similar current or future case. Stare decisis safeguards that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, except overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the US Supreme Court. Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions. Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided". The US common law system has a integrated system of determining legal matters from the principle of stare decisis and precedent. A past ruling or judgment on any circumstance is known as a precedent. Stare decisis commands that courts look to precedent when overseeing an on-going case with similar circumstances.
