Answer:here is ur answer
Explanation:
Cave paintings are a source of information about the early human life. Substantiate. Cave art is significant because it was what people in prehistoric times did in order to record history and culture. From these cave art one can obtain information about the life of early human beings.
Women commit a far smaller share of crimes than men.
<h3>Comparison of crime between Men and Women</h3>
- According to statistics, men are more likely than women to commit crimes. Self-reported delinquent activities are likewise more prevalent in men than in women, albeit being lower than official data.
- Low levels of self-control are linked to criminal behavior. Many experts have provided justifications for this gender disparity.
- Men's evolutionary propensity for risk and violent conduct, harassment variations in activity, social support, or gender disparity are some alternative causes.
- Studies from the past have used psychological and biological factors to explain gender and crime.
- However, specific sociological theories currently examine how gender inequalities in criminal behavior. It's mainly based on how they have been brought up.
To learn more about the Comparison of crime between Men and Women refer to:
brainly.com/question/7469926
#SPJ4
Answer:
innovation
Explanation:
Innovate: Make changes in something established, especially by introducing new methods, ideas, or products.
Answer: The two statutes became known as the “Lost Laws.” Several local figures are credited as being the legal Columbus who (re)discovered the laws. shelved in the Howard University School of Law Library, in one account; at the Library of Congress in another. The laws’ reemergence formed the legal basis of what became District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.
Explanation:
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
