Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
C. I took the quiz
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
точка шлифованияrewq
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
2/1 or in better numbers 2
Step-by-step explanation:
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
Scott will need 168 ft² of pavers to cover his patio
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
Scott wants to cover a trapezoid-shaped patio
<u>This means that:</u>
To get the number of square feet of pavers he'll need, we need to get the area of his patio
<u>Area of trapezium id calculated as follows:</u>
<u>We are given that:</u>
base₁ = 11 ft
base₂ = 13 ft
height = 14 ft
<u>We now substitute with the givens to get the area as follows:</u>
<u>This means that:</u>
Scott will need 168 ft² of pavers to cover his patio
Hope this helps :)
