Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Answer:
higher
Explanation:
because during that same year the individual maybe still getting used to marriage and paying accumulated debt ,on the other hand they still trying to get used to the working environment with demanding hours.they also have to think about the baby.the stress levels become higher because all of the challenges are new facing one person at the same time.
They determine which stories will receive public attention. Because the media has the power to focus the public's attention on a particular issue.
A division of society based on social and economic status.
